Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 200 (0.98 seconds)

Karan Singh Deceased And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 8 August, 2016

CM No.8924-CI of 2016 and RFA No.3261 of 2016 For, learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this court in Ramphal's case (Supra), the present appeal is disposed of in terms of the said decision. However, the appellants shall not be entitled to interest for the period of delay in filing the appeal i.e.1922 days.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Palli - Full Document

Om Singh Deceased & Ors vs State Of Haryana And Others on 8 August, 2016

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 19-09-2016 06:29:54 ::: RFA No.3290 of 2016 -2- CM No.9004-CI of 2016 This is an application for condonation of delay of 1922 days in filing the accompanying appeal. All what has been urged by learned counsel for the applicants is that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the judgement dated 28.01.2016, rendered by this Court in RFA No.1838 of 2011 titled "State of Haryana and others vs. Ramphal", vide which this Court had enhanced the compensation awarded to the landowners.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Palli - Full Document

Ram Kanwar And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 8 August, 2016

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 19-09-2016 06:30:13 ::: RFA No.3291 of 2016 -2- CM No.9009-CI of 2016 This is an application for condonation of delay of 1922 days in filing the accompanying appeal. All what has been urged by learned counsel for the applicants is that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the judgement dated 28.01.2016, rendered by this Court in RFA No.1838 of 2011 titled "State of Haryana and others vs. Ramphal", vide which this Court had enhanced the compensation awarded to the landowners.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Palli - Full Document

Risalo And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 23 September, 2016

CM-8547-CI-2016 For the reasons set out in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Consequently, leave is granted to the LRs of late Bharta and Rajwant (appellant No.8 and 12), who are stated to have passed away on 11.01.2016 and 27.11.2009, during the pendency of the reference, to institute and maintain the present appeal. RFA-3115-2016 For, the learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court in Ramphal's case (supra), the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms. However, the appellants shall not be entitled to interest for the period of delay in filing the appeal i.e. 1762 days.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Palli - Full Document

Inder Singh (Since Deceased) Through ... vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 22 July, 2016

CM No.6286-CI of 2016 in/and RFA No.2049 of 2016 For, the learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the judgement dated 28.01.2016, rendered by this court in the case of State of Haryana (supra), the present appeal is disposed of in terms of the said decision. However, the appellants shall not be entitled to interest for the period of delay in filing the appeal i.e. 2000 days.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Palli - Full Document

Sadhu Ram And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 8 August, 2016

CM No.9013-CI of 2016 This is an application for condonation of delay of 2077 days in filing the accompanying appeal. All what has been urged by learned counsel for the applicants is that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the judgement dated 28.01.2016, rendered by this Court in RFA No.1838 of 2011 titled "State of Haryana and others vs. Ramphal", vide which this Court had enhanced the compensation awarded to the landowners.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Palli - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next