Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.52 seconds)

M/S Universal Sompo General Insurance ... vs Kapu Anuradha 6 Others on 15 February, 2021

6. Sri K. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant, submitted that the compensation cannot be awarded as a bonanza. There is no proof of income of the deceased. The income of the deceased was taken as Rs.12,000/- per month, which is on the higher side. Even if the deceased is treated as a skilled person, his income should not be taken more than Rs.8,000/-. Since the deceased is an Engineering graduate, he has to be treated as a skilled labourer. Learned counsel for the appellant also submitted that the tribunal below erred in ignoring the negligence on the part of the deceased. He also relied upon the decision in NEW INDIAN ASSURANCE CO. 3 LTD. v. DIVISIONAL MANAGER, KURNOOL1; ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. D. KIRAN KUMAR2 and RAJ RANI v. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.3.
Telangana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - B V Reddy - Full Document

Sunandabai Gulabrao Saner Patil And Anr vs Rajendra Bhaskarrao Vabhandik And Anr on 12 February, 2026

7. It is also his contention that, even there is failure to consider appropriate consortium, which ought to have been granted as per the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram alias Chuhru Ram and Others, (2018) 18 SCC 130 as well as judgment of this Court in New India Assurance Co. Ltd vs. Aruna Haumant Yadav and Others, 2020 SCC OnLine Bom 24.
Bombay High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1