Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.99 seconds)

Rajendra @ Rajan vs State Of Mp on 14 August, 2020

It is submitted that as per the prosecution story the applicant was found in possession of 55 litres of illicit country made liquor. He is in custody since 19.08.2019. It is submitted that owing to the criminal history of the present applicant he has to suffer a long conviction period. It is argued that as per the State authorities, 19 criminal cases were shown to have been registered against the present applicant. He has drawn attention of this Court to the criminal history submitted by the 2 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C. No.24378/2020 (Rajendra @ Rajan vs. State of M.P.) State authorities and has argued that just to increase the criminal history of the present applicant the offences are repeatedly shown in the history. Offences mentioned at S.No. 1, 2 and 3 are repeated at S.No.9, 10 and 11. As per the applicant's counsel 16 cases were registered against the present applicant and in four cases he has been acquitted. The order sheets of the four cases are filed by the counsel for the applicant. It is submitted that three cases were registered under Section 110 of Cr.P.C. and as per the information given to him the applicant is convicted in one case registered at Crime No.382/2008 for offence under Section 376 of IPC against which an appeal was filed before the Hon'ble High Court and his suspension application was allowed. His sentence has already been suspended by this Court. It is argued that as far as other offences are concerned, the offences are old cases. Looking to the custody period of the present applicant, he submits that his application for grant of bail may be considered. He is ready to abide by all the terms and conditions that may be imposed by this Court and has shown his willingness to contribute an amount of Rs.15,000/- towards the PM Care Fund. On these grounds, he prays for grant of bail.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document

Raja@Rajendra Rajak vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 January, 2020

Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the applicant as well as fact situation of the case, but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the 3 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C. No.2610/2020 (Raja @ Rajendra Rajak Vs. State of M.P. and another) satisfaction of the concerned trial Court.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 1 - A Pathak - Full Document

Rajan @ Rajendra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 26 October, 2018

Keeping in view the aforesaid submission of learned counsel THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH Cr.R No. 5200/2018 (Rajan @ Rajendra Vs State of M.P.) for the parties and the facts & circumstances of the case, I.A. No. 8228/2018 is allowed. It is directed that the jail sentence of the applicant will remain under suspension subject to the verification that the amount of fine has been deposited, on the appellant furnishing bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM Morena, for his appearance before the concerned CJM on 30th November, 2018 and thereafter on all other subsequent dates as may be fixed by the C.J.M. In case, the applicant is found absent on any date fixed by the concerned C.J.M then the said C.J.M shall be free to issue and execute warrant of arrest for securing his presence without first referring the matter to this Court, provided the Registry of this Court is kept informed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajendra @ Rajen @ Raja vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 August, 2018

Without commenting on the rival contentions in the obtaining facts and circumstances and on parity, in the opinion of this Court, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lac) each only with solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction 2 M.Cr.C.No.31269/2018 (Rajendra @ Rajen @ Raja Vs. State of M.P.)
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next