Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.58 seconds)
Documents citing Gumana Ram vs State Of Raj. & Ors on 4 January, 2010

Bajrang Singh vs State Of Raj on 13 July, 2012

Bajrang Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan [ 3 ] called for a report from the Superintendent of the Central Jail at Ajmer on the jail conduct and general behaviour of the petitioner. The Superintendent of the Central Jail, Ajmer, in his communication dated 01.06.2012 as made to the Government Counsel, has stated, merely with reference to the report as received from the Chief Medical Officer of the Jail Hospital, that the petitioner was not suffering from any mental disorder and there was no doubt about his fair mental condition. The report as made by the Superintendent of the Central Jail falls short of the requirement of our order where it was expected that he would report on the present jail conduct and general behaviour of the petitioner.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D Maheshwari - Full Document

Ravindra Kumar & Ors vs State on 29 June, 2011

While relying upon the above legal position, it is clear that the first information report in itself discloses the commission of the offence and so far as the question of sanction under section 197 Cr.P.C. that has been considered by the trial court as well as by the revisional court and the trial court while relying upon the judgment reported in RLW 1993(2) 615 Ran Singh vs. State of Rajasthan , held that to cause injuries cannot be said to be part of the duty of the public 6 servant and in such cases, protection under section 197 Cr.P.C. is not available. The learned revisional court also affirmed the order of the learned trial court while agreeing with the conclusion drawn by the learned trial court. Where the first information report discloses commission of any offence, the court should not exercise the powers to quash the cognizance.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1