S.Nambirajan vs The High Court Of Madras on 29 June, 2020
___________
Page 35 of 47
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.P.No.10581 of 2020
8.2. He, therefore, contends that this appears to have been a
deliberate act on the part of the petitioner and this material is
reflected from the award passed by the petitioner himself, on the
basis whereof the charge memo has been issued without being
influenced by the observations made by the order of the learned
Single Judge dated 24-10-2016. The High Court on the
administrative side had independently gone into the entire material
and applied its mind to the judgment dated 19.2.2020 passed in
W.A.No.3196 of 2019, in as much as while issuing the charge
memo, one of the documents on which reliance has been placed by
the High Court in the proceedings is the Division Bench judgment,
referred to above. He, therefore, submits that the contention on
behalf of the petitioner that the High Court has not addressed itself
to the said issue before issuing the charge memo is not correct.