Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.27 seconds)

M/S. Genten Infra Projects Private ... vs Sri Balagoni Balraj Goud on 31 March, 2023

On the matter being appealed, the Supreme Court in SLP (C) No. 13650/2022 has affirmed the order of this Court in Terra Infra (supra). It is pertinent to note that the facts of the present case are identical to that of Terra Infra. Therefore, neither the elevation certificate dated 03.03.2020, nor the height clearance obtained on 06.03.2020 or the alleged incidents of trespass on 14.06.2020 and 26.06.2020 extend the period of limitation. Thus, the notice dated 14.08.2020 invoking the arbitration clause is clearly time barred as by the said date the alleged disputes have become deadwood.
Telangana High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 2 - T V Kumar - Full Document

M/S. Pvp Ventures Limited vs Mr. Vinay Chilakapati on 11 July, 2024

Further, it is equally well settled that silence of the respondent to the applicants claims amounts to denial (See: Terra Infra Development Limited Vs. NCC Limited 2), therefore, merely addressing unilateral communications to the respondent herein without receiving any confirmation from the other party does not extend the currency of an expired contract. Further since the respondent had denied its liability and also taking into the fact that there has been no demand from the applicant atleast during the period between 31.12.2015 to 2018 or immediately thereafter the sudden 1MANU/SC/0601/2023 2 MANU/TL/1125/2022 4 demand raised by the applicant for the first time in December, 2015 and then in 2021 would not make the agreement subsisting all through this period.
Telangana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - T V Kumar - Full Document
1