Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.33 seconds)

Sri. T. Nagaraju vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 May, 2017

24. Even looking to the judgment of the Delhi High Court in Puneet Sabharwal vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, the Delhi High Court framed the question for its consideration in para 10 and, while answering the said question, it has observed that, if the meaning of the term "interlocutory order" as used in Section 397(2) of the Cr.P.C. is the same as term as used in Section 19(3)(c) of the PC Act, then there was no requirement for the legislature to again enact Section 19(3)(c) and the legislature could not have intended to give the same 37 meaning to the term "interlocutory order" as has been given in Section 397(2) of Cr.P.C."
Karnataka High Court Cites 38 - Cited by 0 - B R B - Full Document
1