Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 48 (1.25 seconds)

Smt. Ram Kanwari vs Union Of India & Ors on 26 September, 2016

The judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court referred by the petitioner in Haridas Das vs. Smt. Usha Rani Banik & Ors., Young Men Christian Association vs. Holy Mother of Aurobindo Ashram & Ors. and Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Yashwant Singh Negi (supra) are related to the powers of review by the Court and 5 there is no quarrel about proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the above cases. However, in the present case, the petitioner has failed to make out a case for review. Hence, the above cited judgments are of no help to the petitioner.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - V Bishnoi - Full Document

West Bengal State Electricity ... vs West Bengal State Electricity Board ... on 30 August, 2023

25. Mr. Mookherjee submits that in paragraph 44 of Kunhayammed (supra), the Apex Court summed up the law and this was reiterated in Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Yashwant Singh Negi, reported in 2020 (9) SCC 815 (paragraph 3) and for the present purpose enunciation of law in paragraph 44 (iv) and (v) of Kunhayammed are relevant as in the said clauses the effect and implication of a speaking or non-speaking order 14 refusing special leave petition to appeal on future litigation has been clearly stated. In either case it does not attract the doctrine of merger.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - S Bhattacharyya - Full Document

Sh. Amarjeet Singh Lamba vs Sh. Daljit Singh Lamba & Ors on 22 April, 2016

17. Ld. Counsel for the appellants states that the order dated 04.06.2014 has merged in order dated 27.01.2016 and thus, there is no delay in filing the present appeal. To substantiate his contention, Ld. Counsel for the appellants has placed reliance upon the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court bearing SLP (Civil) No 4616/2010 titled as MCD vs. Yashwant Singh Negi decided on 08.04.2013 wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that in case the review petition is allowed and decree /order under review is reversed or modified, such an order shall be a composite order. In the instant case, the Ld. Trial court has dismissed the application u/s 151 CPC for recalling of order dated 04.06.2014 and thus, the contention of the Ld. Counsel for the appellant that order dated 04.06.2014 has merged with order dated 27.01.2016 has no merit.
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next