Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.26 seconds)

N.Ramesh vs Sri. Chandrashekar on 5 March, 2020

24. The learned counsel for the petitioner has canvassed judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in MFA NO.9308/2011 (MV) between United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs. Rathna and others. In the above judgment the Hon'ble High Court has made a proposition of law that if the driver of the insured vehicle has no driving licence there must be clear evidence on record to that effect and police charge sheet is no evidence to hold that the driver of the insured vehicle had no driving licence. He has also canvassed judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka reported in 2004 ACJ 677 between Oriental Insurance company ltd Vs Ramesh.B.Jain and others, wherein, it is held that;
Bangalore District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Srikanth vs Icici Lombard General Ins on 20 March, 2017

49. The counsel for the respondent No.1, by placing reliance on the principles laid down in the above judgments, vehemently contended that mere filing of charge sheet against the driver of the offending vehicle by itself will not be a conclusive proof to hold that there is violation of policy conditions and the same has to be proved by placing on record cogent evidence and in this case, neither the police officials are examined nor the RTO officials and since the vehicle was duly insured with the respondent No.1, prayed the Court to fasten the liability on the respondent No.1.
Bangalore District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1