Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.34 seconds)
Documents citing Amritsar Kennel Club And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors on 28 January, 2016

The Madras Canine Club vs The Union Of India on 22 June, 2021

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue raised in this writ petition has been answered in favour of the petitioner therein in Amritsar Kennel Club (Registered) and others v. the Union of India and others [Civil Writ Petition No.25558 of 2015 dated 28.01.2016 by the Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh]. Hence, he prayed for similar order in this writ petition as well.
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

Delhi Kennel Club vs The Union Of India on 22 June, 2021

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the issue raised in these writ petitions has been answered in favour of the petitioner therein in Amritsar Kennel Club (Registered) and others v. the Union of 4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.Nos.533 and 764 of 2016 India and others [Civil Writ Petition No.25558 of 2015 dated 28.01.2016 by the Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh]. Hence, he prayed for similar order in these writ petitions as well.
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

The Bangalore Canine Club vs The Union Of India on 22 June, 2021

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the issue raised in these writ petitions has been answered in favour of the petitioner therein in Amritsar Kennel Club (Registered) and others v. the Union of India and others [Civil Writ Petition No.25558 of 2015 dated 28.01.2016 by the Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh]. Hence, he prayed for similar order in these writ petitions as well.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

Bombay Presidency Kennel Club vs The Union Of India on 22 June, 2021

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue raised in these writ petition has been answered in favour of the petitioner therein in Amritsar Kennel Club (Registered) and others v. the Union of India and others [Civil Writ Petition No.25558 of 2015 dated 28.01.2016 by the Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh]. Hence, he prayed for similar order in this writ petition as well.
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

The Chennai Kennel Club vs The Union Of India on 21 June, 2021

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue raised in this writ petition has been answered in favour of the petitioner therein in Amritsar Kennel Club (Registered) and others v. the Union of India and others [Civil Writ Petition No.25558 of 2015 dated 28.01.2016 by the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page 3 of 7 W.P.No.18941 of 2015 Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh]. Hence, he prayed for similar order in this writ petition as well.
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 6 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

The Anaimalais Kennel Club vs The Union Of India on 22 June, 2021

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue raised in this writ petition has been answered in favour of the petitioner therein in Amritsar Kennel Club (Registered) and others v. the Union of India and others [Civil Writ Petition No.25558 of 2015 dated 28.01.2016 by the Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh]. Hence, he prayed for similar order in this writ petition as well.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

The Anaimalais Kennel Club vs The Union Of India on 5 August, 2022

2. The issue that is rasied in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in WP No.18941 of 2015 dated 21.06.2021 in The Chennai Kennel Club v. The Union of India, wherein this Court following the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Amritsar Kennel Club (Registered) and others v. The Union of India and others, had held that the second respondent namely Animal Welfare Board of India has no right to disturb conduct of Dog shows by Chennai Kennel Club on the ground that it amounts to Dogs being made Performing Animals. This Court has also held that Chennai Kennel Club hosting a dog show, is not required under any of the provisions of the Act or the Rules of 2001 or the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14940 of 2017 Birth Control Rules to get itself registered with the Animal Welfare Board of India.
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Subramanian - Full Document
1