Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.27 seconds)

Pyare Lal vs The General Manager, Reliance General ... on 21 October, 2013

11. However, the perusal of the record of the District Forum shows that only the insurance cover was given by the opposite parties to the complainant, the same has been placed as Ex. C-2. FIRST APPEAL NO. 143 OF 2009 6 The terms and conditions were not supplied to the complainant, therefore, in case the terms of the policy have not been issued to the complainant then how the opposite parties can rely upon the terms and conditions and its violation. However, in the latest judgment of the Hon'ble National Commission "New India Assurance Co. Ltd. versus Smt. Malti Bhikhabhai Bhoya", 2013 (2) CPR 462 (NC) wherein it has been observed that if there is any breach of warranty or condition of policy including limitation as to use, the complainant is entitled to get 75% of the admissible claim on non-standard basis and there is another judgment of the Hon'ble National Commission "New India Assurance Company Ltd. versus Konda Srinivasa Rao", 2013(2) CPR 564 (NC) on the same point. In that case, claim repudiated on the ground of overloading - State Commission awarded 75% of the claim on non-standard basis. - Order passed by the State Commission does not suffer from any infirmity on any score."
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd vs Manoj Kumar Jaiswal on 27 February, 2015

08.          उत्तरवादी/परिवादी की ओर से उपसंजात होने वाले विद्वान अधिवक्ता श्री बी. मजूमदार का यह तर्क है कि जिला फोरम का आदेश पूर्णतः विधि सम्मत आदेश है। ड्राईव्हर के पास प्रभावी ड्राईव्हिंग लाईसेंस  था और यदि ड्राईव्हर द्वारा उत्तरवादी/परिवादी की अज्ञानता या अनुमति के बिना 1-2 व्यक्ति वाहन में बैठा लिया हो तो वह फण्डामेंटल ब्रीच नहीं है और यदि पॉलिसी का उल्लंघन माना जाये तो भी उत्तरवादी/परिवादी नॉन स्टैण्डर्ड बेसिस पर क्षतिपूर्ति पाने का अधिकारी है। इस संबंध में उत्तरवादी/परिवादी ने New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Malti BhikhaBhai Bhoya II (2013) CPJ 483 (NC), Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Ashok Kumar Dhruv and others 2013 (3) M.P.H.T. 61 (CG), Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Vijay Kumar Dubbey & Anr. II (2012) CPJ 103 (MP)  एवं इस आयोग के Appeal No. FA/13/678 Anil Shrivas Vs. Branch Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited में पारित आदेश दिनांक-03.05.2014 का अवलंबन लिया है।
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Shanta Kumar vs Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company ... on 31 July, 2013

In support of the plea, he places reliance upon a latest precedent of the Honble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Revision Petition No. 3793 of 2007, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Smt. Malti Bhikabhai Bhoya, decided on 16th April, 2013. In that case, the vehicle was registered for carriage of employees of the owner, but some persons, other than the employees, were being carried, when the accident resulting in damage, occurred. The number of the persons was not in excess of the authorized capacity. It was because of these facts that the claim was ordered to be paid on non-standard basis.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1