Atul Sharma vs Union Of India And Others on 21 November, 2025
69. Reliance upon the judgment of the Coordinate Bench in
of
Vishal Sharma's case (supra) would go on to show that it was a
case of re-employment granted to the post of Director, Animal
rt
Husbandry and the Rules in question were contained in Chapter 22
of the Hand Book on Personnel Matters and it was not a case of
extension of the Chief Secretary as such which is under different set
of Rules, as noticed. Therefore, in the said case findings were
recorded that the procedure followed had not been adhered to and it
was held that the re-employment cannot be countenanced and has
been set aside while noting that the file was not at all processed by
the department. Therefore, the justification was found lacking. Thus,
the facts as such in the said case cannot be said to be similar, in any
manner, to the present case.