Sanjay Kumar vs Navneet Singh And Another on 31 January, 2019 (iii)Sadashiv Mallikarjun Kheradkar Vs. Nandini Sadashiv Kheradkar, 1996 (1) RCR (Criminal) 229 (Bombay) ; Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Hajira Beevi And Ors. vs Shamila P. Iqbal And Anr. on 4 November, 2003 In Sadashiv Mallikarjun Kheradkar v. Nandini Sadashiv Kheradkar (1995 Cri LJ 4090 (Bombay) it was held in paragraphs 8 and 9 as follows :-- Kerala High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 2 - P R Raman - Full Document
Smt. Seema Sharma vs Amar Sharma on 21 February, 2006 In the case of Sadashiv Mallikarjun Kheradkar v. Nandini Sadashiv Kheradkar, 1995 Cri.LJ 4090, the Bombay High Court in Paragraphs 8 and 9 has held as under: Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 1 - R Menon - Full Document
Alika Khosla vs Thomas Mathew And Anr. on 20 December, 2001 9. Bombay High Court in the case of SADASHIV MALLIKARJUN KHERADKAR v. NANDINI SADASHIV KHERADKAR AND ANR., 1995 CRL.L.J. 4090 the court relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Goutam Kundu v. State of West Bengal and held that the court has power to direct blood examination but it should not be done as a matter of course or to have roving inquiry. Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Ms. X vs Mr. Z And Anr. on 20 December, 2001 9. Bombay High Court in the case of Sadashiv Malikarjun Kheradkar v. Smt. Nandini Sadashiv Kheradkar and Another, 1995 Crl. Delhi High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 3 - Full Document