Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.71 seconds)
Documents citing Bhupinder Singh Walia vs Varinder Kaur on 26 March, 1991

Nachhattar Singh vs Harjinder Kaur And Anr. on 17 February, 1995

7. However, subsequently in the case of Bhupinder Singh Walia v. Varinder Kaur, reported as 1991 (2) 331 (sic), the wife has been taken suitable time in producing her evidence and it was held that delay in disposal of the case cannot be atrributed to the husband alone and again the order was passed for maintenance from the date of order of learned trial Magistrate.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - V S Aggarwal - Full Document

Imtiyazbhai Abdulbhai Shaikh & vs State Of Gujarat & on 25 February, 2015

The   respondent   No.2,   therefore,  preferred   Criminal   Appeal   No.6   of   2013   before   the   learned   Sessions  Court and requested that the amount of Rs.2,000/­ per month by way of  interim maintenance be awarded from the date of the application and  not from the date of the order. The said appeal was allowed. Learned  advocate,   therefore,   submitted   that   the   learned   Sessions   Court   has  committed an error by awarding the amount of interim maintenance of  Rs.2,000/­   per   month   from   the   date   of   the   application   i.e.   from  30.10.2010.  The   learned  Sessions  Court  ought  to  have  confirmed  the  order passed by the learned Magistrate and thereby the learned Sessions  Court ought to have awarded the amount of Rs.2,000/­   per month as  interim maintenance from the date of the order i.e. from 19.10.2013.  Learned advocate has relied upon the decision rendered by the Punjab &  Hariyana High Court in the case of Bhupinder Singh Walia v. Varinder  Kaur.,  reported   in  1993  Cri.L.J.  1128  and   submitted   that   when   the  delay in disposal of the case is not caused due to husband alone, and if  wife   is   taking   more   time   in   producing   her   evidence,   grant   of  maintenance from the date of application is not justified and therefore  the maintenance was awarded from the date of the order.
Gujarat High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - V M Pancholi - Full Document

Sh. Ram Kishore vs State Of Gujrat 2005 Cri. L.J. 2114 (Csc) ... on 13 July, 2010

9. The Ld. counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgment citied as Bhupinder Singh Walia Vs. Varinder Kaur 1993 Cri. L.J. 1128 wherein Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court held that where the delay in disposal of case was not caused due to husband alone and wife taking more time in producing her evidence, granting of maintenance from the date of application was not justified and therefore, the maintenance was granted from the date of order. I find that the above ratio of law is squarely applicable to present case because the perusal of record reveals that the respondent have not promptly prosecuted the petition before Ld. MM and taken CR NO. 44/09 Page No.6 of 8 much longer time in completing the evidence and once even the PE was closed by Ld. MM on 14.07.2000 by adverse order as the respondents herein had failed to produce evidence despite ample opportunities. Thus, I find force in the submissions of Ld. counsel for the petitioner that the direction granting payment of maintenance from the date of filing of petition was not justified.
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1