Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 53 (1.74 seconds)

Hikal Limited vs Union Of India on 11 September, 2025

111. As noted above, the decision of the Gujarat High Court in Messers Addwrap Packaging Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and of the Uttarakhand High Court in Sri Sai Vishwas Polymers (supra) also take the view that the repeal of the impugned Rules vide Notification dated 08 October 2024 is neither backed by any savings clauses nor do the provisions of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act apply to such omission or repeal.
Bombay High Court Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

Bharat Wire Ropes Limited And Anr vs Union Of India And 5 Ors on 11 September, 2025

111. As noted above, the decision of the Gujarat High Court in Messers Addwrap Packaging Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and of the Uttarakhand High Court in Sri Sai Vishwas Polymers (supra) also take the view that the repeal of the impugned Rules vide Notification dated 08 October 2024 is neither backed by any savings clauses nor do the provisions of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act apply to such omission or repeal.
Bombay High Court Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

Jindal Drugs Private Limited vs The Union Of India on 11 September, 2025

111. As noted above, the decision of the Gujarat High Court in Messers Addwrap Packaging Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and of the Uttarakhand High Court in Sri Sai Vishwas Polymers (supra) also take the view that the repeal of the impugned Rules vide Notification dated 08 October 2024 is neither backed by any savings clauses nor do the provisions of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act apply to such omission or repeal.
Bombay High Court Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

Alkem Laboratories Ltd vs The Union Of India And 6 Ors on 11 September, 2025

111. As noted above, the decision of the Gujarat High Court in Messers Addwrap Packaging Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and of the Uttarakhand High Court in Sri Sai Vishwas Polymers (supra) also take the view that the repeal of the impugned Rules vide Notification dated 08 October 2024 is neither backed by any savings clauses nor do the provisions of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act apply to such omission or repeal.
Bombay High Court Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

Supriya Lifescience Limited vs Union Of India on 11 September, 2025

111. As noted above, the decision of the Gujarat High Court in Messers Addwrap Packaging Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and of the Uttarakhand High Court in Sri Sai Vishwas Polymers (supra) also take the view that the repeal of the impugned Rules vide Notification dated 08 October 2024 is neither backed by any savings clauses nor do the provisions of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act apply to such omission or repeal.
Bombay High Court Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

Augmont Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. vs The Union Of India And 5 Ors. on 11 September, 2025

111. As noted above, the decision of the Gujarat High Court in Messers Addwrap Packaging Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and of the Uttarakhand High Court in Sri Sai Vishwas Polymers (supra) also take the view that the repeal of the impugned Rules vide Notification dated 08 October 2024 is neither backed by any savings clauses nor do the provisions of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act apply to such omission or repeal.
Bombay High Court Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

Astec Lifesciences Limited vs Union Of India on 11 September, 2025

111. As noted above, the decision of the Gujarat High Court in Messers Addwrap Packaging Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and of the Uttarakhand High Court in Sri Sai Vishwas Polymers (supra) also take the view that the repeal of the impugned Rules vide Notification dated 08 October 2024 is neither backed by any savings clauses nor do the provisions of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act apply to such omission or repeal.
Bombay High Court Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

Nevatia Steel And Alloys Pvt Ltd. And Anr vs Union Of India Through The Secretary And ... on 11 September, 2025

111. As noted above, the decision of the Gujarat High Court in Messers Addwrap Packaging Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and of the Uttarakhand High Court in Sri Sai Vishwas Polymers (supra) also take the view that the repeal of the impugned Rules vide Notification dated 08 October 2024 is neither backed by any savings clauses nor do the provisions of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act apply to such omission or repeal.
Bombay High Court Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

Yasho Industries Limited vs Union Of India And 3 Ors. on 11 September, 2025

111. As noted above, the decision of the Gujarat High Court in Messers Addwrap Packaging Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and of the Uttarakhand High Court in Sri Sai Vishwas Polymers (supra) also take the view that the repeal of the impugned Rules vide Notification dated 08 October 2024 is neither backed by any savings clauses nor do the provisions of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act apply to such omission or repeal.
Bombay High Court Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

Kalp Overseas vs Union Of India And Ors on 11 September, 2025

111. As noted above, the decision of the Gujarat High Court in Messers Addwrap Packaging Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and of the Uttarakhand High Court in Sri Sai Vishwas Polymers (supra) also take the view that the repeal of the impugned Rules vide Notification dated 08 October 2024 is neither backed by any savings clauses nor do the provisions of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act apply to such omission or repeal.
Bombay High Court Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next