Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (2.32 seconds)
Documents citing Jai Prakash Yadav Alias Makhanchu vs State Of U.P. on 2 November, 2020

Krishna Kumar vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 13 July, 2022

Counsel for the petitioners has also submitted that identical controversy have already came up for consideration before this Court in several writ petitions being Writ B No. 561 of 2021 (Makhanchu vs. State of U.P. & 3 Others), Writ B No.2000 of 2021 (Suresh Kumar & Another vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation & 6 Others) etc., wherein parties were relegated before the authority concerned for providing opportunity of hearing.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - D Pathak - Full Document

Champa Devi And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 12 July, 2022

Counsel for the petitioners has also submitted that identical controversy have already came up for consideration before this Court in several writ petitions being Writ B No. 561 of 2021 (Makhanchu vs. State of U.P. & 3 Others), Writ B No.2000 of 2021 (Suresh Kumar & Another vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation & 6 Others) etc., wherein parties were relegated before the authority concerned for providing opportunity of hearing.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - D Pathak - Full Document

Mahadei vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 2 August, 2022

It is also submitted that identical controversy came up for consideration before this Court in Writ-B No. 561 of 2021 (Makhanchu vs. State of U.P. and 3 others), Writ-B No. 575 of 2021 (Lautu Ram and another vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) and Writ-B No. 578 of 2021 (Arjun vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) etc. Aforesaid writ petitions were allowed on the first date itself. Copy of the orders passed in the aforesaid writ petition are filed in the instant petition.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - D Pathak - Full Document

Kripa Shankar And Another vs State Of U.P. And 8 Others on 17 August, 2022

The questions involved in this writ petition and the questions that were raised, considered and answered by this Court vide judgment and orders dated 15.11.2021, 01.07.2021 and 28.07.2021 in Writ-B Nos. 2000 of 2021 (Suresh Kumar and another Vs. DDC and 6 others), Writ-B No561 of 2021 (Makhanchu vs. State of U.P. and 3 others), Writ-B No.575 of 2021 (Lautu Ram and another vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) respectively are similar. Aforesaid writ petitions were allowed and matters were remanded back before Consolidation Officer for passing fresh orders in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties. Para Nos. 16 and 17 of Writ-B No.2000 of 2021 is as follows:
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Murta Devi And 2 Others vs State Of U P And 8 Others on 17 August, 2022

The questions involved in this writ petition and the questions that were raised, considered and answered by this Court vide judgment and orders dated 15.11.2021, 01.07.2021 and 28.07.2021 in Writ-B Nos. 2000 of 2021 (Suresh Kumar and another Vs. DDC and 6 others), Writ-B No561 of 2021 (Makhanchu vs. State of U.P. and 3 others), Writ-B No.575 of 2021 (Lautu Ram and another vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) respectively are similar. Aforesaid writ petitions were allowed and matters were remanded back before Consolidation Officer for passing fresh orders in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties. Para Nos. 16 and 17 of Writ-B No.2000 of 2021 is as follows:
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jagdish Kumar And 3 Others vs State Of U P And 8 Others on 17 August, 2022

The questions involved in this writ petition and the questions that were raised, considered and answered by this Court vide judgment and orders dated 15.11.2021, 01.07.2021 and 28.07.2021 in Writ-B Nos. 2000 of 2021 (Suresh Kumar and another Vs. DDC and 6 others), Writ-B No561 of 2021 (Makhanchu vs. State of U.P. and 3 others), Writ-B No.575 of 2021 (Lautu Ram and another vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) respectively are similar. Aforesaid writ petitions were allowed and matters were remanded back before Consolidation Officer for passing fresh orders in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties. Para Nos. 16 and 17 of Writ-B No.2000 of 2021 is as follows:
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Kamla Devi And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And 8 Others on 17 August, 2022

The questions involved in this writ petition and the questions that were raised, considered and answered by this Court vide judgment and orders dated 15.11.2021, 01.07.2021 and 28.07.2021 in Writ-B Nos. 2000 of 2021 (Suresh Kumar and another Vs. DDC and 6 others), Writ-B No561 of 2021 (Makhanchu vs. State of U.P. and 3 others), Writ-B No.575 of 2021 (Lautu Ram and another vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) respectively are similar. Aforesaid writ petitions were allowed and matters were remanded back before Consolidation Officer for passing fresh orders in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties. Para Nos. 16 and 17 of Writ-B No.2000 of 2021 is as follows:
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Basdev And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And 6 Others on 29 August, 2022

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in similar facts the identical matters came up before this Court for consideration in Writ-B No. 561 of 2021 (Makhanchu Vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others), Writ-B No. 575 of 2021 (Lautu Ram & Another Vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others), Writ-B No. 578 of 2021 (Arjun Vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others) and Writ-B No. 2000 of 2021 (Suresh Kumar & Another Vs. DDC & 3 Others). Aforesaid writ petitions were allowed on the same day considering the illegality in the impugned order passed by the Consolidation Officer. Copies of the said orders are annexed with the present petition. In view of the orders passed in the aforesaid petitions, counsel for the petitioners submits that the instant writ petition may also be allowed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - V Varma - Full Document
1