Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.26 seconds)

M/S Gtl Infrastructure Ltd vs Sh. Vijay Kohli on 4 October, 2023

6. Mr. Swetank Shantanu, learned counsel appearing for the appellant however points-out that in the said decision, the Division Bench has upheld the decision of a commercial court in a commercial suit, to say that an application under section 8 of the A&C Act would not lie after the right of a party to file written statement has been closed. It is pointed-out however, that a perusal of the impugned order in the present case would show that in this case, the application under section 8 of A&C Act was filed and 'declined' before the right to file written statement was closed, though by the self-same order.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A J Bhambani - Full Document

Smfg India Home Finance Co. Ltd ... vs Harjinder Kaur & Anr on 8 April, 2026

6. Subsequently, another Division Bench in M/s Hitachi Payments Services Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Sh. Shreyans Jain & Anr.2 while reiterating the observations in SPML Infra Ltd. (supra), also referred to the decision of a coordinate Bench in Ranjana Bhasin vs. Surender Singh3, wherein it was held that an application under Section 8 of the A&C Act is not maintainable if filed beyond the period prescribed for filing of the written statement.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - M K Ohri - Full Document
1