Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (1.06 seconds)
Documents citing Balwant Singh Alias Banta And Others vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 17 November, 2011

Arjun Bhanot vs State Of Punjab on 27 August, 2021

No doubt, the accused can file successive applications for grant of bail, but the maintainability of the subsequent petition would depend a lot upon nature of the bail prayed for. Here it will be useful to refer the decision of this Court in "Balwant Singh @ Banta Vs. State of Punjab", passed in CRM-M-15464-2019 on 04.04.2019, wherein the distinction between the anticipatory bail and regular bail was noticed. The relevant part is extracted below:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 2 - M Bajaj - Full Document

Pamma vs State Of Haryana on 21 November, 2022

"15. No doubt, the accused can file successive applications for 3 of 11 ::: Downloaded on - 24-11-2022 03:31:35 ::: -4- CRM-M-53784 of 2022 grant of bail, but the maintainability of the subsequent petition would depend a lot upon nature of the bail prayed for. Here it will be useful to refer the decision of this Court in "Balwant Singh @ Banta Vs. State of Punjab", passed in CRM-M-15464- 2019 on 04.04.2019, wherein the distinction between the anticipatory bail and regular bail was noticed. The relevant part is extracted below:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Saleem vs State Of Punjab on 22 July, 2019

It is the specifically pleaded by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the concession of interim regular bail was extended to him on 17.10.2018 by the trial Court on the ground that the FSL report was awaited. Arrest is apprehended on the ground that the said report stands submitted before the trial Court and, therefore, concession of pre-arrest bail is prayed for. It is not disputed that the petitioner had submitted himself before the trial Court and was extended the concession of regular bail. Therefore, the present petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C is not 2 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 25-08-2019 23:47:35 ::: CRM-M-30708-2019 (O & M) -2- maintainable in view of the law laid down by this Court in CRM-M-15464- 2019 titled as Balwant Singh @ Banta versus State of Punjab decided on 04.04.2019.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M Bajaj - Full Document

Gurcharan Singh Alias Jackey vs State Of Punjab on 27 April, 2021

The argument of the learned counsel that since the FSL report has been filed, therefore, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest, is apparently misconceived, as the petitioner consciously accepted the limited concession of interim regular bail, who is well aware of its condition and operative period, therefore, it is imperative for the petitioner to surrender before the trial Court in compliance of the said order. The petitioner after 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 06-06-2021 04:51:40 ::: CRM-M-17558-2021 2 availing the concession under Section 439 Cr.P.C. cannot seek anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. In this regard, reference can be made to the decision dated 04.04.2019 delivered by this Court in "CRM-M-15464-2019 titled as Balwant Singh @ Banta Vs. State of Punjab."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - M Bajaj - Full Document

Harwinder Kumar @ Bhima vs State Of Punjab on 7 September, 2021

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, this Court finds that as the petitioner was granted concession of interim regular bail, this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. would not be maintainable and in this regard, reference can be made to decision passed by this Court vide order dated 04.04.2019 in CRM-M-15464-2019 titled as Balwant Singh @ 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 08-09-2021 22:30:29 ::: CRM-M-19350-2021 2 Banta Vs. State of Punjab. The relevant observations are as under:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M Bajaj - Full Document
1   2 Next