Shanti Bai Jarwal vs Smt. Manju Kunare on 17 October, 2025
In contrast, the purposive line commencing with the
decision of Punjab and Haryana High Court in Paramjeet Kumar
Saroya (supra), the decisions of Bombay High Court in Jagdish
Pitambar Pawar (supra) and Riddhi Dawle (supra), the decision of
Delhi High Court in Rakhi Sharma v/s State in W.P. No. 2895 of 2021,
the decision of Allahabad High Court in Smt. Roopam (supra) and the
decision of this Court in Nitin Jat (supra), wherein the courts have read
Section 16 as permitting an appeal by any affected party. Learned
A.A.G. submitted that these latter judgements give life to the first
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: RAVI PRAKASH
Signing time: 17-10-2025
18:55:59
NEUTRAL CITATION NO.2025:MPHC-IND:30762
24
W.P. No.12 of 2025
proviso, avoid procedural anomaly and conform to the remedial nature
of the enactment.