Ajeet Prasad @ Ajeet Kumar vs State Of Bihar on 13 May, 2010
Reliance has also been placed on the judgment reported in
2001 (1) BCCR page 187 (Chandramani Sah Vs. State of
Bihar) and it has been submitted that plurality of
witnesses is not necessary to establish a fact in issue and
a conviction can be passed on the testimony of a sole
witness provided that evidence is fully reliable. Arguing on
behalf of the State it has been pointed out that the
appellant Ajeet Prasad has managed to enlarge on bail on
the basis of forged bail order vide Fax no. 4860 dated
4.3.2004. The appellant has committed such crime during
trial by faxing the fake bail order.