Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.29 seconds)
Documents citing The New India Assurance Co.Ltd vs L.Agnes on 2 November, 2012

The Branch Manager vs G. Sumathi on 14 September, 2018

In this context, the learned counsel for the appellant placed reliance on the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in the case of New India Assurance Co., Limited Vs. L.Agnes and others, reported in 2013 (1) TN MAC 631, in which, it was held that the occupant of a car cannot be construed as a third party. It was also held that the occupants of the car are entitled to get compensation from the insurer in which they travelled only on account of additional premium that is payable by the owner of the vehicle and not in the capacity of third parties.
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - R Subbiah - Full Document

New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Rajkumar Ramchand Vasvani & 4 on 30 September, 2014

The learned advocate for the appellant- Insurance Company invited attention of the Court to decision of the Division Bench of Madras High Court in the matter of New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. L. Agnes & others, reported in 2014 ACJ 1216. The learned advocate submitted that once the Hon'ble Tribunal was pleased to earmark negligence to the extent of 30% of the driver of the truck insured by the appellant- Insurance Company there was no reason for the Hon'ble Tribunal to direct the appellant- Insurance Company to deposit the entire amount when respondents no.1 to 4 were held liable jointly and severally. The learned advocate also invited attention of the Court to decision of this Court in First Appeals No.384 to 388 of 2000.
Gujarat High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R R Tripathi - Full Document

New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Rekhaben Kishanchand Vasvani & 8 on 30 September, 2014

The learned advocate for the appellant- Insurance Company invited attention of the Court to decision of the Division Bench of Madras High Court in the matter of New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. L. Agnes & others, reported in 2014 ACJ 1216. The learned advocate submitted that once the Hon'ble Tribunal was pleased to earmark negligence to the extent of 30% of the driver of the truck insured by the appellant- Insurance Company there was no reason for the Hon'ble Tribunal to direct the appellant- Insurance Company to deposit the entire amount when respondents no.1 to 4 were held liable jointly and severally. The learned advocate also invited attention of the Court to decision of this Court in First Appeals No.384 to 388 of 2000.
Gujarat High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R R Tripathi - Full Document
1