Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.52 seconds)

Anil Kishore Gupta vs State Bank Of India Through Its ... on 16 August, 2023

"15. These writ petitions filed by the petitioners deserve to be dismissed for the reasons; firstly the respondents have taken a conscious decision based on the report of the Expert Committee for withholding the result of the petitioners as they were found using unfair means; secondly, this court cannot sit as an Appellate Authority over the decision of the respondents based on the report of the Expert-Committee, thirdly the judgment cited by the learned counsel for the petitioners of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Union of India (Supra) is not applicable in the facts of the present case as in the aforesaid matter the lecturers were appointed and after joining the services were terminated without giving any opportunity of hearing while in the present matters the petitioners have not even been selected as yet and, thirdly as the petitioners have participated in the selection process after careful reading of the terms, and conditions of the advertisement, as such they are estopped to challenge the same in view of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Ashok Kumar (supra) and lastly, in my considered view no illegality has been committed by the respondents for invoking clause 10(6) of the advertisement based on the report of the Expert-Committee."
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - I Ali - Full Document

Mr. Ramesh Singhal vs Punjab National Bank on 11 January, 2021

4. If that be so, the petition is disposed of directing the respondent-Bank to consider the review petition filed by the petitioner on July 17, 2020 strictly in accorance with the parameters laid down by the Regulation-18 within eight weeks from today and communicate the decision to the petitioner who if aggrieved shall seek such remedy as available, in accordance with law.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - V K Rao - Full Document
1