Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 26 (1.09 seconds)
Documents citing Thakur Prasad vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 January, 1953

Tomaso Bruno vs State Of U.P. on 20 January, 2015

“52. We may at the threshold say that a finding of fact concurrently recorded on the question of alibi is not disturbed by this Court in an appeal by special leave. The legal position in this regard is settled by the decision of this Court in Thakur Prasad v. State of M.P. (AIR 1954 SC 30 at p. 31, para 2) “2. The plea of alibi involves a question of fact and both the courts below have concurrently found that fact against the appellant Thakur Prasad.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - R Banumathi - Full Document

Gurpreet Singh vs State Of Haryana on 12 September, 2002

Next, however, is the plea of alibi as raised by the appellant when the husband stated that after the dinner he alongwith a friend went to Gymkhana Club for a coffee and it is only at the club that he was informed of the fire in the house which prompted the appellant to return to his house immediately. This plea of alibi stands disbelieved by both the courts and since the plea of alibi is a question of fact and since both the courts concurrently found that facts against the appellant, the accused, this Court in our view, cannot on an appeal by special leave go behind the above noted concurrence finding of fact. This stands well settled for about five decades and reference may be made to the decision of this Court in Thakur Prasad vs. State of Madhya Pradesh(1954 Crl.Law Journal 261).
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 99 - U C Banerjee - Full Document

Gosu Jairami Reddy & Anr vs State Of A.P on 26 July, 2011

concurrent finding on a question which is a pure question of fact namely whether accused A1 and A3 were at Anantpur at the time of incident leading to the murder of deceased Pulla Chinna Reddy took place in his stone polishing factory at Village Sajjaladinne warrants any interference. We may at the threshold say that a finding of fact concurrently recorded on the question of alibi is not disturbed by this Court in an appeal by special leave. The legal position in this regard is settled by the decision of this Court in Thakur Prasad v. The State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 1954 SC 30 Vol. 41 "The plea of alibi involves a question of fact and both the courts below have concurrently found that fact against the appellant. This Court, therefore, cannot, on an appeal by special leave, go behind that concurrent finding of fact."
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 36 - T S Thakur - Full Document

Tomaso Bruno & Anr vs State Of U.P on 20 January, 2015

"52. We may at the threshold say that a finding of fact concurrently recorded on the question of alibi is not disturbed by this Court in an appeal by special leave. The legal position in this regard is settled by the decision of this Court in Thakur Prasad v. State of M.P. (AIR 1954 SC 30 at p. 31, para 2) [pic] "2. The plea of alibi involves a question of fact and both the courts below have concurrently found that fact against the appellant Thakur Prasad. This Court, therefore, cannot, on an appeal by special leave, go behind that concurrent finding of fact."
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 287 - R Banumathi - Full Document
1   2 3 Next