Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.86 seconds)
Documents citing Sachin & Ors. vs Central Reserve Police Force & Anr. on 20 January, 2023

Surender Kumar And Others vs Govt Of Nct Of Delhi And Others on 16 February, 2024

Reliance was also placed by the petitioners therein on Sachin and Others v. Central Reserve Police Force (supra), as well as High Court of Delhi v. Devina Sharma (supra). It was observed by this Court that in case the relaxation as claimed is granted, it would create a separate class/category of applicants with vested rights for age relaxation which is not the intention of REVIEW PET.46/2024 in W.P.(C) 9378/2021 Page 7 of 8 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DINESH CHANDRA Signing Date:01.03.2024 16:29:25 the Recruitment Rules. Further, granting of relief of age relaxation would create a situation where the potential applicants who could not come to the Tribunal would be deprived of such an opportunity. Further, creating such type of class and vested rights in favour of applicants therein would be in violation of Article 14 and 16 of Constitution of India, because it will discriminate other potential candidates who would have applied had they known that such relaxation would be granted. Also, the judgments referred to above as relied on behalf of the petitioners were found distinguishable on facts.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sitangsu Kumar Dey & Ors vs The Airports Authority Of India & Ors on 28 January, 2025

On behalf of AAI it is further submitted that the ratio laid down in Sachin & Ors. (supra) assist the case of AAI and for that reason no age relaxation should be granted. It is also submitted by AAI that no vested right had accrued in favour of the petitioners as they were not the selected candidates under the 2022 recruitment process for which the petitioners are required to be given relaxation of age due to cancellation of the 2022 recruitment process.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - A Mukherjee - Full Document

Col. Laxmi Narayan (Retd.) & Ors vs Coal India Limited & Ors on 23 December, 2025

15. Having no difference of opinion than the one rendered earlier in Sachin (Supra) in the light of the fact that candidates, such like petitioners herein, who have been aspiring to join Indian Army on the post of Sepoy Pharma, but have not been able to pursue their dreams due to non-advertisement of the vacancies and have turned over aged, in the interest of justice cannot be deprived to appear in the examination if they fulfill other eligibility criteria."
Delhi High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - A Sharma - Full Document

Mukesh Kumar And Ors vs Indo Tibetan Border Police Force And Anr on 24 July, 2023

17. The other judgment referred to by learned counsel for petitioners of the Co-ordinate Bench Sachin (supra) is also not applicable for the reason that the recruitment in that case was for ASI (steno), Head Constable (Ministerial) in CRPF. It is not in dispute that the Units of CRPF are posted not only in high-altitude and high-terrain areas but are also posted in soft areas as distinct from ITBP where most of the Units are posted in hard areas. There can be no comparison between the two posts and the requirement of fitness level for the said posts.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Sachdeva - Full Document

Nitish Kumar & Ors. vs Union Of India & Anr. on 14 March, 2023

15. Having no difference of opinion than the one rendered earlier in Sachin (Supra) in the light of the fact that candidates, such like petitioners herein, who have been aspiring to join Indian Army on the post of Sepoy Pharma, but have not been able to pursue their dreams due to non- advertisement of the vacancies and have turned over aged, in the interest of justice cannot be deprived to appear in the examination if they fulfill other eligibility criteria.
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Atul Kumar And Ors vs The Chief Secretary And Ors on 20 May, 2024

3. It is in these circumstances that the present writ petition has been filed. In support of the petition, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the learned Tribunal has failed to appreciate that the recruitment process was being conducted after more than six years, with the earlier examination having been held in 2017. He submits that in several cases, where recruitment examinations were being conducted after such delay, age relaxation has been granted to several similarly situated persons. He submits that even the railways have in the recruitments held in the recent past granted age relaxations to candidates. Further, he draws our attention to the decision rendered by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court dated 20.01.2023 in W.P.(C) 90/2023 titled Sachin & Ors. vs Central Reserve Police Force & Anr. to submit that the petitioners are also entitled to the same age W.P.(C) 7256/2024 Page 2 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:BABLOO SHAH Signing Date:21.05.2024 13:23:28 relaxation. He, therefore, prays that writ petition be allowed and the petitioners be permitted to provisionally appear in the aforesaid recruitment examination.
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Palli - Full Document

Praveen Rawat vs Dsssb on 15 October, 2025

"A. The last advertisement for direct recruitment on the post of Pharmacist (Dispenser) in MCD was issued by the respondents in the year 2014. It is submitted that for last 10 years no vacancies have been advertised for filling the unfilled vacancies of Pharmacist (Dispenser) in MCD. Consequently, the applicants are entitled to 10 years age relaxation in terms of law declared by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Sachin & Ors. Vs. Central Reserve Police Force & 4 M.A No. 34/2025 in O.A No. 1550/2024 Item 12 (C-3) Ors., decided on 20.01.2023, MANU/DE/0713/2023. However, the applicants herein, as a one time measure are seeking age relaxation for only 02 years.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sachin vs Union Of India And Ors on 17 April, 2023

"a.) To issue appropriate writ directing the Respondents to provide age relaxation to the Petitioner herein for the duration during which no selection to the post of Constable (Technical and Tradesmen) was held, i.e. more than 6 years; b.) To pass similar directions as were passed by this Hon'ble Court in the case of Sachin and Ors. v. Central Reserve Police Force and Anr., W.P.(C) 90/2023, and provide an age relaxation of 3 years over and above the Petitioner's prescribed upper age limit;
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S K Kait - Full Document
1   2 Next