Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.48 seconds)
Documents citing Partap Singh vs Union Of India & Oks on 6 September, 1985

Partap Singh vs Union Of India And Others on 18 April, 2024

2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of by extending the time for the adjudication of the arbitration proceedings in Arbitration Reference Case No.38 of 2016, titled as Partap Singh versus Union of India and others. Let the arbitration proceedings be positively completed within a period of six months from today. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A M Goel - Full Document

Youth Welfare Federation Rep. By Its ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Rep. By Its ... on 9 October, 1996

9. The learned referring Judges observed that it appeared from the observations of Sen. J. in Krishna Singh's case (supra) that uncodified personal laws, not altered by usage or custom, are outside the purview of Part III of the Constitution and that only if they are modified or abrogated by statute, their constitutional validity could be tested with reference to the Part III of the constitution, but that the decision was not noticed in the two later decisions - Saroj Rani v. Sudarshan Kumar, and Partap Singh v. Union of India, in which respectively the constitutionality of certain provisions of Hindu Marriage Act and Hindu Succession Act, and the constitutional validity of Section 14(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, was considered. But the question of personal laws being outside or not of the ambit of Part III of the Constitution did not arise in the two cases.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 95 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mrs. Lalitha Ubhayakar And Another vs Union Of India And Another on 26 July, 1990

4. Smt. Gayathri Balu, learned counsel for the petitioners, drew my attention to a decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Partap Singh v. Union of India, wherein it has been pointed out that a special provision has been made in regard to women under cl. (3) of Art. 15 of the Constitution. That is precisely what S. 8 of the Act is enacted for without which provision a Hindu woman who was not in married status could not make an adoption. Any possible discrimination on account of sex was, therefore, eliminated having regard to Art, 14 of the Constitution.
Karnataka High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Dennision Paulraj vs The Union Of India on 3 April, 2009

In 1985 SC 1695  Partap Singh v. Union of India, the question that was posted before the Hon'ble Apex Court was about the constitutional validity of Section 14 (1) of the Hindu Succession Act. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the said judgment has clearly held that in view of Article 15 (3) of the Constitution of India there is hardly any justification for the males belonging to the Hindu community to raise any objection to the beneficent provisions contained in Section 14 (1) of the Act on the ground of hostile discrimination. Para 6 of the said judgment is usefully extracted here under:-
Madras High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sikandar Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 5 October, 2010

The petitioner participated in the auction, cognizant of the condition that requires a contractor to pay proportionate charges, incurred for environmental clearance and is, therefore, estopped from impugning this condition. Reference by counsel for the petitioner to directions issued by a Division Bench in Civil Writ Petition No.13706 of 2009 (Partap Singh Sandhu v. Union of India) holding that the State of Punjab would be required to obtain environmental clearance would not dilute the petitioner's liability as the obligation to obtain environmental clearance and the right to demand charges for environmental clearance are entirely different matters. The obligation to obtain environmental clearance may rest with the Government but the petitioner's obligation to pay these charges arises from the terms and conditions of the contract awarded to the petitioner.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R Bhalla - Full Document
1