Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (1.42 seconds)
Documents citing Mr. Narinder Batra vs Union Of India on 2 March, 2009

The Hindu Educational Trust vs University Of Delhi And Anr. on 30 May, 2017

Such a reading militates against the very object of bringing fresh talent from diverse fields and hence the need to put a cap of five terms on a particular nominee of the petitioner‟s Society to be on the Governing Body of the College. Though an exception has been carved out in the impugned resolution itself for two nominees of the petitioner‟s Society. Such a provision in the impugned resolution supplements Ordinance XVIII and does not contravene the same. He would state that this Court in the case of Narinder Batra v. Union of India (supra) considered the validity of an W.P.(C) 494/2013 and connected matters Page 36 of 57 administrative guidelines and in para 239 has held that, "by the guidelines the Government has not prohibited formation of an association, society or federation with regard to any sport. It has only mandated that in order to be entitled to financial assistance or recognition as a national level body by the Union Government, it would require to be a society or an association or federation which enforces democracy by fixing the tenure of the office bearers....". In para 241 of the said judgment, the Cout also noted that, "..if such a tenure clause was not enforced, the office bearers could be repeatedly elected form the particular region and continue to dominate the affairs of the association/federation after having created a monopoly over the sport.". In para 242 of the said judgment, it has been held that, "..a limited office tenure, certainly would have the impact of minimizing, if not eliminating allegations, criticism and elements of nepotism, favouritism and bias of any kind. In a country having a federal structure of the nature that India possesses, the office bearers being in circulation and there being change in the representation on the executive of a national level body would go a long way in promoting the diversity and expertise in the sport". He would state, that the same ethos shall be applicable in the constitution and composition of Governing Body of a College.
Delhi High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - V K Rao - Full Document

Mahipal Singh & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 3 August, 2018

(vii) That the NSCI binds, and cannot tolerate deviation at the hands of any NSF, stands conclusively held by the judgements of this Court in Indian Olympic Association (supra), Rahul Mehra-I (supra) and Rahul Mehra-II (supra), as well as, on principle, Narinder Batra (supra). Non-compliance with the stipulations in the NSCI would, ipso facto, disentitle to the concerned NSF from any right to recognition, as well as from the facilities made available, by the Government, to NSFs, financial and otherwise.
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 5 - C H Shankar - Full Document

Kamlesh Mehta vs Table Tennis Federation Of India And Ors on 11 May, 2026

15. TTFI, is recognised by the Union of India as a National Sports Federation ("NSF") for the promotion and development of the sport discipline of Table Tennis. The NSF is fully responsible for the overall management, direction, control, regulation, and sponsorship of Table Tennis. The NSF, including TTFI, is responsible for the selection of athletes, for participation in major international and national events, to present the Country, and carry its flag, on the global platform. The Supreme Court in Narinder Batra v. Union of India,3 took note of the benefits which are conferred upon an NSF in the following words:
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Dr. Chajjed Arunkumar vs Registrar Of Societies And Ors. on 27 July, 2022

12. Broadly speaking, the proposition that a writ cannot lie against a private society cannot be disputed in light of several judgments and decisions, including previous orders passed by this Court. Nevertheless, since Petitioner has argued to the contrary by placing reliance on two judgments, those need to be briefly noted and discussed. Firstly, reliance was placed on the case of M/s Narinder Batra v. Union of India,1 which pertained to the Indian Hockey Federation. Although the said Federation is also a private society registered under the Act, yet, a writ was entertained for the reason, that the Indian Hockey Federation controls the game of hockey in the country at all levels, its members are the State Hockey Associations and the boards of Government departments such as railways and services controlling the game in their services all over the country. It has been recognised as a national sports federation, akin to the control of the BCCI over cricket players. This distinguishing factor, which is evident from a reading of paragraph 47 of the said judgment, renders the said judgment inapplicable.
Delhi High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S Narula - Full Document
1