Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.66 seconds)

Niyoti Roy vs Mayarani Roy on 25 February, 2025

9. Ext. 3 is the board certificate (original) issued in the name of Sujit Kumar Roy S/o of Indrajit Roy by Bihar School Examination Board, Patna, which is in the nature of public documents and has been proved and marked as exhibit without any objection by the respondents. Despite this, it is surprising that the Court did not accept it, merely on the ground that the signatures on the certificate was not proved. Similarly, the admit card issued by the Board, in the name of same person and by the same institution duly proved without any objection has not been accepted. Ext-5 and Ext-6 are school leaving certificate and character certificates issued by the school, cannot be said to be public documents, but they are adduced into evidence and marked as exhibits without objection, and therefore there was no reason to have discarded them. This is to be noted that these certificates were of the period during his lifetime. Once a document has been duly proved without objection, the same cannot be refused to be admitted ( see Junul Surin v. Silas Munda, 2008 SCC OnLine Jhar 132) It has been held in Rishipal Singh Solanki v. State of U.P., (2022) 8 SCC 602 :
Jharkhand High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - G K Choudhary - Full Document

T.G.Venugopal vs State Of Kerala on 23 February, 2026

9. Apart from the above decision, the learned senior counsel placed another decision of Jharkhand High Court in Junul Surin and Others v. Silas Munda and Others reported in [MANU/JH/0394/2008 : AIR 2008 Jhar 82] . In the said case, the question considered by the High Court of judicature in Jharkhand was whether report of delivery possession by the Circle Inspector of executive Court is a public document? While deciding the question, in paragraph No.10, the Jharkhand High Court held as under:
Kerala High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1