Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Writ Petition No.2192 of 2005 the accused filed application seeking de-exhibiting of the documents filed by PW 1 with his evidence on affidavit

challenge the admissibility of the said document. Accordingly, he sought to de-exhibit the said document. A counter was filed stating that the said application ... Whether the document marked as Ex.A1 can be de- exhibited, if so to what result? The trial Court, by its order dated

Evidence Act to de-exhibit the document once exhibited in evidence, cannot be found fault with. However, such exhibition of documents shall be in accordance ... exhibited as Exhibits 3 to 9, that itself did not constitute exhibition of those documents in evidence. Besides, the endorsement itself disclosed that the exhibition

deferred at request. Later, the plaintiff filed the instant application for de-exhibiting the said document marked as exhibit B1. The said petition was resisted ... exclude the CC of unregistered partition deed from evidence after de-exhibiting it, as it is not properly stamped and registered. 5. The case

Code of Civil Procedure , 1908 (for short " CPC ") for de-exhibiting the document Ex.P1, i.e. the Will dated ... read with Section 151 of the CPC for de-exhibiting the document Ex.P1 alleging that since in its order dated 18.03.2008, the Court

under Order 13 Rule 3 C.P.C . for de-exhibiting the agreement of sale dt.23-06-2004. 20. In the affidavit filed ... conclude the cross-examination; and so the document requires to be de-exhibited since it is a manipulated and a created document. 21. Counter-affidavit

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (for short ' CPC ') to de-exhibit the document marked as Ex.A.1-unregistered sale deed, dated ... trial Court has allowed the said application and de-exhibited Ex.A.1 subject to payment of costs of Rs.10,000/- payable

chief was filed on 27.8.2009, filed an application Exh.82 for de-exhibiting the document. The trial Court vide its order dated 8.6.2011 rejected ... order exhibiting the document itself is not challenged, the plaintiff can not assail any other order passed below Exh.82 for de- exhibiting the document

petitioner, who is respondent in the rent petition, for de-exhibiting the documents mentioned/exhibited in the affidavit filed in the Court ... application was preferred at this stage by the petitioner, praying for de-exhibiting the documents so exhibited. He contends that the Rent Controller should have

assailing the order dated 19.9.2011 whereby learned trial Court de-exhibited case diary, which was earlier exhibited as DW10/F. Brief facts inter alia ... Evidence Act, therefore, it cannot be exhibited. If Court has wrongly exhibited it, Court has ample power to de-exhibit the same. Mr. Puneet Jindal