Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (1.28 seconds)Ito Wd 2(3), Mumbai vs Reliance Enterprises, Mumbai on 12 July, 2019
In fact, in case of Om Swamy
Smaran Developers Pvt. Ltd. (supra), the Co-ordinate Bench following
the decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in CIT v/s Brahma
Associates, [2011] 833 ITR 289 (Bom.) has held that deduction
claimed under section 80IB(10) of the Act can be disallowed on pro-
rata basis by restricting it to the residential units which have violated
the condition of section 80IB(10) of the Act. In any case of the matter,
in assessee's own case for the assessment year 2013-14 and 2014-
15, the Tribunal has allowed assessee's claim of deduction on pro-rata
basis under identical facts and circumstances. In view of the aforesaid,
we are inclined to uphold the decision of the learned Commissioner
(Appeals) on the issue. Moreover, as rightly held by the learned
11
Reliance Enterprises
Commissioner (Appeals), the violation having been made in financial
year 2012-13, the pro-rata disallowance has to be made in A.Y.
2013-14 and not in the impugned assessment year. Grounds raised
are dismissed.
Shri. Sharan P Khanna, Mumbai vs Ito 3 (2)(2), Mumbai on 1 April, 2021
1