Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.32 seconds)
Documents citing Mangilal vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr on 18 October, 2001

Harka Ram vs The State Of Rajasthan on 22 March, 2006

36. It may be mentioned that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has set aside the order of the trial Court dated 27.3.2000, by which the accused Harka Ram was acquitted of the offences under Section 307 and 324 IPC. It may also be mentioned that vide judgment dated 18th October, 2001, passed in Criminal Appeal No. 1063/2001 (Mangilal v. The State of Rajasthan and Anr.), the Hon'ble Supreme Court has granted Special Leave to Appeal and the accused- appellant Harka Ram S/o Guru Bachhan raj has been held guilty of offences under Section 307, 324 and 498-A, IPC.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Mugu Service Co-Operative Bank ... vs State Co-Operative Election ...

Above all, it is beyond dispute that the preparation of the electoral roll is part of the election process. It is trite that once the election process is commenced, the same shall not be interfered with even by Courts, especially at the instance of persons who have alternative statutory remedies in the form of election petitions for redressal of their grievances. (see Mangilal v State of Rajasthan and Another [(2001) 8 SCC 519] and Shaji K. Joseph v Vishwanath [(2016) 4 SCC 429]. Ext.P7 decision of the Election Commission is, therefore, illegal and without jurisdiction.
Kerala High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - P B Kumar - Full Document
1