Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.30 seconds)
Documents citing Union Of India Thru General Manager , New ... vs Anirudh Kumar Singh on 29 July, 2010

Sh. Devinder Kumar vs Union Of India on 6 January, 2016

3. According to statement of Section 19 of the Act filed by the Collector, separate reference was made to the court, which was decided in case LAC No. 93/09/06 titled as Union of India vs. Anirudh Sharma and others and was numbered as IP No. 5 as per judgment dated 17.07.2009. As per judgment dated 17.07.2009, the matter was compromised and settled in that court as well as before Mediation Cell, so the compromise was accepted and an amount of Rs.1145860.70 was decided for the IP No. 5.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Gurbir Singh vs Union Of India on 7 January, 2016

3. According to statement of Section 19 of the Act filed by the Collector, separate reference was made to the court, which was decided in case LAC No. 93/09/06 titled as Union of India vs. Anirudh Sharma and others and was numbered as IP No. 7 as per judgment dated 17.07.2009. As per judgment dated 17.07.2009, the matter was compromised and settled in that court as well as before Mediation Cell, so the compromise was accepted and an amount of Rs.320972.29 was decided for the IP No. 7.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Raj Kumar Talwar vs Union Of India on 11 January, 2016

3. According to statement of Section 19 of the Act filed by the Collector, separate reference was made to the court, which was decided in case LAC No. 93/09/06 titled as Union of India vs. Anirudh Sharma and others and was numbered as IP No. 10 as per judgment dated 17.07.2009. As per judgment dated 17.07.2009, the matter was compromised and settled in that court as well as before Mediation Cell, so the compromise was accepted and an amount of Rs.320972.29 was decided for the IP No. 10.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Rajinder Singh vs Union Of India on 11 January, 2016

3. According to statement of Section 19 of the Act filed by the Collector, separate reference was made to the court, which was decided in case LAC No. 93/09/06 titled as Union of India vs. Anirudh Sharma and others and was numbered as IP No. 6 as per judgment dated 17.07.2009. As per judgment dated 17.07.2009, the matter was compromised and settled in that court as well as before Mediation Cell, so the compromise was accepted and an amount of Rs.320972.29 was decided for the IP No. 6.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Chaman Lal Sachdeva vs Union Of India on 12 January, 2016

3. According to statement of Section 19 of the Act filed by the Collector, separate reference was made to the court, which was decided in case LAC No. 93/09/06 titled as Union of India vs. Anirudh Sharma and others and was numbered as IP No. 4 as per judgment dated 17.07.2009. As per judgment dated 17.07.2009, the matter was compromised and settled in that court as well as before Mediation Cell, so the compromise was accepted and an amount of Rs.641944.57 was decided for the IP No. 4.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Mohan Lal Ghai vs Union Of India on 12 January, 2016

3. According to statement of Section 19 of the Act filed by the Collector, separate reference was made to the court, which was decided in case LAC No. 93/09/06 titled as Union of India vs. Anirudh Sharma and others and was numbered as IP No. 8 as per judgment dated 17.07.2009. As per judgment dated 17.07.2009, the matter was compromised and settled in that court as well as before Mediation Cell, so the compromise was accepted and an amount of Rs.641944.57 was decided for the IP No. 8.
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Ashok Kumar Ghai vs Union Of India on 8 January, 2016

3. According to statement of Section 19 of the Act filed by the Collector, separate reference was made to the court, which was decided in case LAC No. 93/09/06 titled as Union of India vs. Anirudh Sharma and others and was numbered as IP No. 2 as per judgment dated 17.07.2009. As per judgment dated 17.07.2009, the matter was compromised and settled in that court as well as before Mediation Cell, so the compromise was accepted and an amount of Rs.641944.57 was decided for the IP No. 2.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1