Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.69 seconds)
Documents citing Ganesh Nivrutti Marne vs The State Of Maharashtra Through on 7 May, 2010

The State Of Maharashtra vs Rahul Ramchandra Taru on 6 May, 2011

14 The learned APP placed reliance on unreported judgment in the case of Ganesh Nivrutti Marne vs. The State of Maharashtra in Criminal Appeal No. 930 of 2009 decided on 07th May, 2010. That appeal also had arisen from the Special Case No. 02 of 2007 which was filed by the accused no.7 whose application for discharge was rejected by the Special Judge, Special Court, Pune. It appears that the appellant in the said case was operating his own gang called as "Ganesh Marne Gang". Allegations against him were that he was operating a crime syndicate and committed several offences of similar nature in the past to gain an edge over the rival gang and to achieve supremacy in the local ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 17:15:56 ::: spb/-
Bombay High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 13 - M N Gilani - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra vs Jagan Gagansingh Nepali on 5 August, 2011

5. Learned Addl.P.P. as well as Mr.Desai, learned Senior Counsel submit that the two Division Benches of this Court in Anil Sadashiv Nanduskar v. State of Maharashtra, 2008 (3) Mh.L.J.(Cri) 650 and in the case of Ganesh Nivrutti Marne v. State of Maharashtra, 2010 (2) BCR(Cri) 586 have taken a view that the term "other advantage" cannot be read as ejusdem generis with pecuniary benefits and undue economic advantage. It is submitted that the said view is a correct view taking into consideration legislative intent and, as such, the same needs to be upheld.
Bombay High Court Cites 55 - Cited by 31 - B R Gavai - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra vs Jagan Gagansingh Nepali on 5 August, 2011

5. Learned Addl.P.P. as well as Mr.Desai, learned Senior Counsel submit that the two Division Benches of this Court in Anil Sadashiv Nanduskar v. State of Maharashtra, 2008 (3) Mh.L.J.(Cri) 650 and in the case of Ganesh Nivrutti Marne v. State of Maharashtra, 2010 (2) BCR(Cri) 586 have taken a view that the term "other advantage" cannot be read as ejusdem generis with pecuniary benefits and undue economic advantage. It is submitted that the said view is a correct view taking into consideration legislative intent and, as such, the same needs to be upheld.
Bombay High Court Cites 55 - Cited by 0 - B R Gavai - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra vs Jagan Gagansingh Nepali on 5 August, 2011

5. Learned Addl.P.P. as well as Mr.Desai, learned Senior Counsel submit that the two Division Benches of this Court in Anil Sadashiv Nanduskar v. State of Maharashtra, 2008 (3) Mh.L.J.(Cri) 650 and in the case of Ganesh Nivrutti Marne v. State of Maharashtra, 2010 (2) BCR(Cri) 586 have taken a view that the term "other advantage" cannot be read as ejusdem generis with pecuniary benefits and undue economic advantage. It is submitted that the said view is a correct view taking into consideration legislative intent and, as such, the same needs to be upheld.
Bombay High Court Cites 55 - Cited by 0 - B R Gavai - Full Document

State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi vs Khalil Ahmed on 23 April, 2012

"14. The learned APP placed reliance on unreported judgment in the case of Ganesh Nivrutti Marne vs. The State of Maharashtra in Criminal Appeal No. 930 of 2009 decided on 07th May, 2010. That appeal also had arisen from the Special Case No. 02 of 2007 which was filed by the accused no.7 whose application for discharge was Crl.Rev.P.42/2012 Page 42 of 57 rejected by the Special Judge, Special Court, Pune. It appears that the appellant in the said case was operating his own gang called as "Ganesh Marne Gang". Allegations against him were that he was operating a crime syndicate and committed several offences of similar nature in the past to gain an edge over the rival gang and to achieve supremacy in the local area. The Division Bench in the case (supra) examined the facts in Special Case No. 2 of 2007 qua the appellant before analysing expressions "continuing unlawful activity", "organised crime" and "organized crime syndicate".
Delhi High Court Cites 71 - Cited by 10 - S K Kait - Full Document
1