Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.42 seconds)
Documents citing R.C.P. Infratech Private Limited vs Smt. Sharda Devi Agrawal 20 ... on 18 February, 2019

Manmohan Singh vs Gurdeep Singh And Ors on 22 July, 2019

In support of his contentions, learned counsel for the appellant placed reliance on Phool Patti and another v. Ram Singh (Dead) through LRs and another, 2015 (1) R.C.R.(Civil) 606 (SC), Bhoop Singh v. Ram Singh Major, 1996(1) PLR 559 (S.C.), Roshan Lal and another v. Resham Lal and another, 2005(2) R.C.R.(Civil) 445 (P&H), Jai Narain v. Smt. Sona Devi, 2006(2) Civil Court Cases 99 (P&H), Inder Singh and others v. Deiya (since deceased) represented by his LRs and another, RSA No.2531 of 2003 decided on 26.09.2011 (P&H), Ajit Kaur @ Surjit Kaur v. Darshan Singh (Dead) through LRs, 2019(2) R.C.R.(Civil) 786 (S.C.), Durga Das v. Collector and others, 1997(2) R.C.R.(Civil) 84 (S.C.), Dhian Singh v. Sheela Devi and others, 2008(1) R.C.R.(Civil) 792 (P&H), Bhajan Kaur v. Nasib Kaur and others, 2018(2) Law Herald 1164 (P&H), Gurdip Singh v. Manmohan Singh and others, 2000(4) R.C.R.(Civil) 19 (P&H), Manmohan Singh v. Financial Commissioner, Appeals-II, Punjab, CWP No.19526 of 2007 decided on 03.08.2007 (P&H), Manmohan Singh v. Financial Commissioner, Appeals-II, Punjab and others, CWP No.10234 of 2008 decided on 03.08.2011 (P&H) and Ibrahim alias Dharam vir v. Smt. Sharifan alias Shanti, 1979 PLJ 469 (P&H).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - R K Jain - Full Document

State vs Ravinder Prakash Gupta Ors on 28 June, 2024

3. Dheeraj Kumar S/o Sh. R. P. Gupta R/o R/71, Flat No. 3, FF, Khirki Extension, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi. 4. Swatantra S/o Sh. R. P. Gupta State Vs. Ravinder Prakash & Ors FIR No. 190/2006 P.S. Delhi Cantt. Digitally signed by NABEELA WALI NABEELA Date: WALI 2024.06.28 18:16:03 +0530 2 R/o R/71, Flat No. 3, FF, Khirki Extension,Malviya Nagar, New Delhi. 5. Vikas S/o Sh. Parmanand Parikh R/o Aggarwal Farm House, Dera Gaon, Delhi. 6. Ishahid @ Babloo S/o Sh. Khalik R/o H. No. 20, Shahurpur Peer, Nand Chandu Nola Thana, Mehrauli, Delhi. 7. Shri Niwas (Absconding) S/o Sh. P. S. Kasoria R/o H. No. 217, Sector 1, Mahavir Vihar, Dwarka, New Delhi. 8. Yateesh S/o Sh. R. N. Sahoo R/o A/402, Plot No. 36, Rajasthan Apartment, Sector-4, Dwarka, New Delhi.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mr Kamal Gupta And Ors vs M/S Lr Builders Pvt Ltd on 4 December, 2025

6. It may also be noted that arguments were heard on 21.11.2025, and case was listed for orders on 29.11.2025. On that day orders could not be passed as respondent had preferred a transfer petition bearing T.P. (Crl.) 143/2025 titled as M/s. L.R. Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kamala Gupta & Ors. before the Ld. Principal District & Sessions Judge (HQ) which came to be dismissed on 28.11.2025.
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

National Insu.Co. vs Jayendra Singh on 2 November, 2020

^vihykFkhZ^½ }kjk miHkksDrk laj{k.k vf/kfu;e 1986 dh /kkjk 15 ds vUrxZr ftyk miHkksDrk fookn izfrrks"k.k vk;ksx nfr;k¼la{ksi esa ^^ftyk vk;ksx^^½ }kjk izdj.k Øekad 85@2007 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 02-08-2007 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA -2- 2- la{ksi esa izdj.k ds rF; bl izdkj gSa fd] izfrvihykFkhZ@ifjoknh }kjk ,d VªsDVj iath;u Ø- ,e-ih- 32&2184 ,p-,e-Vh- daiuh dk Ø; fd;k x;k FkkA ftldk chek vihykFkhZ chek daiuh ds ;gk¡ djk;k x;k ,oa izfro"kZ izhfe;e jkf'k dk Hkqxrku fd;k tkrk jgk gSA izfrvihykFkhZ ds vuqlkj fnukad 9-1-07 dks mDr chfer VªsDVj 'kqxj QSDVªh Mcjk ls xUuk Mkydj okil vk jgk Fkk ftls pkyd jkds'k xqtZj pyk jgk Fkk] VªsDVj nfr;k&Xokfy;j jksM ij xksjk?kkV ds vkxs fpeuh ds ikl ,d dkj ls Vdjkdj {kfrxzLr gks x;k] ftlls VªsDVj ds baftu ds nks VqdM+s gks x;sA bl ?kVuk dh fjiksVZ izfrvihykFkhZ ds yM+ds /kesaZUnz }kjk Fkkuk xksjk?kkV ij ntZ djk;h xbZ] ftldk vijk/k Ø- 05@07 gSA ?kVuk dh lwpuk izfrvihykFkhZ }kjk vihykFkhZ chek daiuh dks nh xbZA vihykFkhZ ds deZpkfj;ksa }kjk ?kVuk LFky dk fujh{k.k dj {kfrxzLr okgu dk eqvk;uk fd;k x;kA vihykFkhZ ds funsZ'k ij izfrvihykFkhZ }kjk mDr okgu dks ,p-,e-Vh- VªsDVj ds vf/kd`r foØsrk esllZ xqIrk VªsDVlZ ds odZ'kki ij ejEer ds fy, fn;k ftldk bLVhesV :- 91]913@& fn;k x;kA izfrvihyykFkhZ us VªsDVj dh ejEer djk yh ,oa vihykFkhZ ls Dyse jkf'k ds Hkqxrku gsrq vusdksa ckj lEidZ fd;k] fdUrq vihykFkhZ }kjk Dyse dk Hkqxrku ugha fd;k x;kA vr% izfrvihykFkhZ }kjk lsok esa deh ds vk/kkj ij ftyk vk;ksx esa ifjokn izLrqr dj] vihykFkhZ ls {kfriwfrZ ds :i esa dqy :- 1]01]913@& fnyk;s tkus dh ekax dhA izfrvihyhZ }kjk ifjokn ds leFkZu esa Lo;a dk 'kiFk i=] izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ chek ikfylh dh QksVks izfr] Mªk;foax yk;lsal dh izfr] VªsDVj esa lq/kkj gsrq bLVhesV dh izfr vkfn nLrkost izLrqr fd;s x;sA 3- vihykFkhZ }kjk ftyk vk;ksx ds le{k mRrj esa ;g vfHkopu fd;k fd mDr VªsDVj d`f"k dk;Z gsrq chfer Fkk fdUrq izfrvihykFkhZ }kjk nq?kZVuk ds le; VªsDVj esa lokfj;k¡ cSBk;h gqbZ Fkh] tks fd ikfylh dh 'krZ dk mYya?ku gSA vihykFkhZ ds vuqlkj mlds losZ;j }kjk {kfr dk vkadyu :- 30]000@& fd;k x;k Fkk] fdUrq ikfylh dh 'krZ dk mYya?ku gksus ds dkj.k izfrvihykFkhZ dk Dyse uks&Dyse fd;k -3- dj mldh lwpuk Hkst nh xbZ FkhA izfrvihykFkhZ }kjk tokc ds leFkZu esa 'kk[kk izca/kd ;ksxs'k dkSf'kd dk 'kiFk i= o nLrkost izLrqr fd;s x;sA 4- ftyk vk;ksx }kjk mHk;i{kksa dks lquk x;kA vk;ksx ds le{k izfrvihykFkhZ }kjk iwjs ?kVukØe dk fooj.k izLrqr fd;k ,oa crk;k fd VªsDVj gYdk eksVj ;ku¼LMV½ dh Js.kh esa vkrk gS] ftldk yk;lsal nq?kZVuk ds le; pkyd ds ikl FkkA mlds ckn Hkh vihykFkhZ us Dyse dk fujkdj.k u dj lsok esa deh dh gSA vihykFkhZ }kjk rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd chfer VªsDVj dk dsoy d`f"k iz;kstu ds fy, gh mi;ksx djuk Fkk] tcfd nq?kZVuk ds le; izfrvihykFkhZ VªsDVj esa lokjh ysdj tk jgk Fkk rFkk VªsDVj pkyd ds ikl fu/kkZfjr yk;lsl a ugha FkkA VªsDVj ij jked`".k] cSBk Fkk rFkk pUnzHkku o j?kqohj Vªkyh esa cSBs gq, Fks] rHkh ;g nq?kZVuk gqbZA ftlls ;g Li"V gS fd VªsDVj dk mi;ksx d`f"k dk;Z ds fy, u gksdj lokjh <ksus ds fy, fd;k tk jgk FkkA vihykFkhZ }kjk vius i{k leFkZu esa U;k; n`"Vkar Senior Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation Of India Ltd. Vs Merey Lonappan 1998(3) C.P.R. 448, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Pabindra Narayan Uzir 2006 (3)C.P.R. 270 (NC), Jewellers Narandas & Sons Vs The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. 1994 (1) C.P.R. 108(NC), Pappu Vs Om Prakash 2000 (1) M.P.W.N. 'kkVZ uksV 9 ,oa M/s Star Auto & Engineers Of Ambala City Vs The United India Insurance Co. Of Ambala City 1994 (1)C.P.R. 333, egs"k dqekj rFkk ,d vU; cuke gfj"kadj iVsy rFkk vU; (1) nq?kZVuk eqvkotk izdj.k 479 ¼e- iz-½ National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Kanti Devi(Mrs.) & Anr. 2005(5) Supreme Court Cases 789 izLrqr fd;sA -4- 5- ftyk vk;ksx }kjk mDr U;k; n`"Vkarksa dh foospuk djrs gq, ;g cryk;k x;k fd eksVj ;ku vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 2¼21½ esa VªsDVj dks gYdk eksVj ;ku ds :i esa ifjHkkf"kr fd;k x;k gSA vFkkZr ,slk okgu ftldk otu 7500 fdyksxzke ls vf/kd u gksA 6- izdj.k esa VªsDVj pkyd dk Mªk;foax yk;lsal ^^izn'kZ ,&6^^ izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] tks vkjVhvks nfr;k }kjk tkjh fd;k x;k gS] ftlesa pkyd jkds'k xqtZj dks gYdk eksVj ;ku pykus gsrq oS| ,oa izHkkoh Mªk;foax yk;lsl a izkIr FkkA nq?kZVuk ds le; izfrvihykFkhZ ds VªsDVj ds lkFk tks Vªkyh yxh Fkh] mlesa Qly ;k vU; dksbZ otu ugha Hkjk gqvk FkkA vihykFkhZ ftyk vk;ksx ds le{k ,slh dksbZ lk{k izLrqr ugha dj ldk ftlds vk/kkj ij ;g ekuk tkos fd VªsDVj Vªkyh dk otu 7500 fdyksxzke ls vf/kd jgk gksA izdj.k esa vkjVhvks nfr;k }kjk ,d izek.k i= vihykFkhZ ds vf/koDrk ds i= ij fn;k x;k gS] ftlesa ifjHkkf"kr fd;k x;k gS fd VªsDVj Vªkyh esa ifg;s c<+us ls og gYdk eksVj ;ku dh vfHkO;fDr esa ugha ekuk tkosxkA ysfdu mldk dksbZ fof/klaxr vk/kkj izdj.k esa izLrqr ugha gqvkA 7- mHk;i{kksa dks lquus ,oa izdj.k dh foospuk mijkar ftyk vk;ksx }kjk ;g vknsf'kr fd;k x;k fd vihykFkhZ@foi{kh] izfrvihykFkhZ@ifjoknh dks losZ;j fjiksVZ ^^izn'kZ vkj&7^^ ds vuqlkj VªsDVj dh {kfr ds :i esa :- 44]952@&] yscj fjis;lZ dh en esa :- 5]500@& vkns'k fnukad ls ,d ekg ds vUnj vnk djus gsrq ftyk vk;ksx esa tek djsA lkFk gh vihykFkhZ@foi{kh] izfrvihykFkhZ@ifjoknh dks {kfr/ku jkf'k :- 44]952@& ij Dyse izLrqrh fnukad 12-01-2007 ls Hkqxrku fnukad rd 7 izfr'kr okf"kZd C;kt lfgr C;kt dh jkf'k vkns'k fnukad ls ,d ekg ds vUnj izfrvihykFkhZ@ifjoknh dks iznku djus gsrq ftyk vk;ksx esa tek djsA blds vfrfjDr vihykFkhZ@foi{kh] izfrvihykFkhZ@ifjoknh dks :- 800@& vf/koDrk 'kqYd ,oa vU; O;; ds :i esa iznku djsxkA -5- 8- bl vk;ksx ds le{k vihykFkhZ }kjk fofHkUu U;k; n`"Vkar izLrqr fd;s x;s ,oa vkjVhvks nfr;k dk i=] ftlesa VªsDVj ds lkFk Vªkyh gksus ds dkj.k okgu N% ifg;ksa dh Js.kh esa vk tkus ds dkj.k fo'ks"k Js.kh dk okgu ekuk tkos] ,slk rdZ Hkh fd;kA 9- ftyk vk;ksx }kjk ikfjr vkns'k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA vihykFkhZ ds rdksZa ,oa izdj.k esa izLrqr lEiw.kZ nLrkostksa dk voyksdu mijkUr fopkj.kh; fcUnq ;g ik;k tkrk gS fd D;k nq?kZVuk ds le; VªsDVj pkyd ds ikl oS| yk;lsal Fkk ;k ugha ,oa VªsDVj dk mi;ksx d`f"k dk;Z ds fy, gks jgk Fkk vFkok O;kolkf;d iz;kstu ds fy, mi;ksx gks jgk Fkk\ blesa dksbZ fookn ugha gS fd izfrvihykFkhZ us VªsDVj d`f"k dk;Z dss fy, Ø; fd;k Fkk ,oa og d`f"k dk;Z ds fy, mldk mi;ksx djrk FkkA d`f"k dk;Z esa [ksr dh tqrkbZ gsrq VªsDVj esa IykÅ@dYVhosVj yxkuk vko';d gS rkfd tqrkbZ dk laiw.kZ dk;ZZ gks lds] ek= VªsDVj tqrkbZ ugha dj ldrk gSA blh izdkj Qly dVus ds ckn Qly dks e.Mh@'kqxj fey ys tkus ds fy, VªsDVj esa Vªkyh yxkdj Qly dks igq¡pk;k tkrk gSA 10- vihykFkhZ }kjk ekuuh; jk"Vªh; vk;ksx }kjk fjohtu fiVh'ku Ø- 4863@2013 Hkkjrh vDlk tujy ba';ksjsl a da-fy- fo:) vUuk lkgsc ckiqjko ?k.Mqjs vkns'k fn- 21-04-2016 dk tks U;k; n`"Vkar izLrqr fd;k gS] mlesa VªsDVj ds lkFk 2&Vªkyh vVSp Fkha] ftlesa xUuk Hkjk gqvk FkkA tcfd eksVj ;ku vf/kfu;e 1988 esa VªsDVj dks /kkjk 2¼21½ esa bl izdkj ifjHkkf"kr fd;k x;k gS %& 2-¼21½ ^^gYdk eksVj ;ku^^ ls vfHkizsr gS ,slk dksbZ ifjogu ;ku ;k cl ftlesa ls fdlh dk ldy ;ku Hkkj] ,slh eksVj dkj ;k VªsDVj ;k jksM&jksyj ftlesa ls fdlh dk ynku jfgr Hkkj] 1[7,500] fdyksxzke ls vf/kd ugha gS ;
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bank Of Baroda Through Its Manager, ... vs Balaprasad Bansilal Biryani, Died Per ... on 15 March, 2021

12. The opponent has also produced the judgment of Hon'ble National Commission on similar issue in (1) Revision Petition Nos. 955/2002 (Bank of Baroda Vs. Gollaudi Sree Rama Murthy and Ors. (2) R.P.No. 3173/2018 Bank of Baroda Vs. Ravindra Agrawal and Ors. and R.P.No.3174/2018 Bank of Baroda Vs. Nish Agrawal, R.P. No. 3175/18 Bank of Baroda Vs. Bhagwan das Gupta & Ors. wherein similar issue was before Hon'ble National Commission wherein Hon'ble National Commission held that there is no deficiency in service on the part of opponent Bank and dismissed the complaint. Hence, it is the contention of opponent Bank of Baroda that the order of District Consumer Forum is liable to be set aside and to allow the appeal and dismissed the complaint.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nikki @ Urmila vs Deepak on 5 April, 2022

At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant has referred to Division Bench judgments of this Court in cases of Sheela Devi vs. Gurmukh Singh, 2012 (8) R.C.R (Civil) 54, Paramjeet vs. Bhim Singh, 2014 (30) R.C.R (Civil) 201 and Rashwinder Kaur vs. Ravinder Pal Singh, 2013 (1) HLR 483 to contend that the maintenance having not been paid, the Court has no option but to strike off the defence of the respondent-husband and grant a decree of divorce in favour of the appellant-wife. Accordingly, the allegations of the appellant-wife have gone unrebutted and the same are held to be accepted.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R Bahri - Full Document
1   2 Next