Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 53 (0.04 seconds)
Documents citing Station House Officer ... vs B.A. Srinivasan on 5 December, 2019

Manish Kalani vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 December, 2025

In Station House Officer v. B.A. Srinivasan (supra), it has been held that; "the issue whether the alleged act is intricately connected in discharge of official function and whether the matter would come within the expression "while acting or purporting to act in discharge of their official duty", would at times get crystalized only after evidence is led and issue of sanction can be agitated at the later stage as well."
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document

U.K. Samal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 December, 2025

In Station House Officer v. B.A. Srinivasan (supra), it has been held that; "the issue whether the alleged act is intricately connected in discharge of official function and whether the matter would come within the expression "while acting or purporting to act in discharge of their official duty", would at times get crystalized only after evidence is led and issue of sanction can be agitated at the later stage as well."
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document

U.K.Samal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 December, 2025

In Station House Officer v. B.A. Srinivasan (supra), it has been held that; "the issue whether the alleged act is intricately connected in discharge of official function and whether the matter would come within the expression "while acting or purporting to act in discharge of their official duty", would at times get crystalized only after evidence is led and issue of sanction can be agitated at the later stage as well."
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document

D.P. Tiwri vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 December, 2025

In Station House Officer v. B.A. Srinivasan (supra), it has been held that; "the issue whether the alleged act is intricately connected in discharge of official function and whether the matter would come within the expression "while acting or purporting to act in discharge of their official duty", would at times get crystalized only after evidence is led and issue of sanction can be agitated at the later stage as well."
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document

D.P.Tiwari vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 December, 2025

In Station House Officer v. B.A. Srinivasan (supra), it has been held that; "the issue whether the alleged act is intricately connected in discharge of official function and whether the matter would come within the expression "while acting or purporting to act in discharge of their official duty", would at times get crystalized only after evidence is led and issue of sanction can be agitated at the later stage as well."
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document

Bhaurao Raghoji Ingole vs The State Of Mah.Thr.Pso Washim on 22 February, 2024

In support of his contention, he placed reliance on the decision in the case of Station House officer CBI vs. B.A.Srinivasan supra wherein the Honourable Apex Court held that protection under Section 19 of the said Act is available to a public servant only till he is in employment and no sanction there under is necessary after the public servant demitted the office or retired from service.
Bombay High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Piush Kumar Gupta Son Of Kailash Nath ... vs State Of Jharkhand on 25 April, 2022

In the circumstances of the present case, at this stage, the ratio of the judgement passed in the case of Prakash Singh Badal (supra) as well as the judgement passed in the case reported in (2020) 2 SCC 153 (Station House Officer versus 19 B.A. Srinivasan) (supra) as quoted above, is fully applicable. So far as the point of the petitioner that he had acted in terms of the guidelines of the Railways is concerned, it is essentially a matter of defence which cannot be appreciated at this stage of cognizance. The requirement of sanction or otherwise, in the facts and circumstances of this case will also depend upon the evidence to be produced and considered before the learned court below at appropriate stage and it is for the learned court below to consider the materials and figure out as to whether the petitioner can be proceeded without sanction for prosecution under Section 197 Cr.P.C. The points argued by the petitioner cannot be appreciated at this stage and it is suffice to say that there is sufficient material against the petitioner for taking cognizance of the offence.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - A R Choudhary - Full Document

Sandeep Yadav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 6 October, 2025

In Station House Officer v. B.A. Srinivasan (supra), it has been held that; "the issue whether the alleged act is intricately connected in discharge of official function and whether the matter would come within the expression "while acting or purporting to act in discharge of their official duty", would at times get crystalized only after evidence is led and issue of sanction can be agitated at the later stage as well."
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rakesh Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 December, 2025

In Station House Officer v. B.A. Srinivasan (supra), it has been held that; "the issue whether the alleged act is intricately connected in discharge of official function and whether the matter would come within the expression "while acting or purporting to act in discharge of their official duty", would at times get crystalized only after evidence is led and issue of sanction can be agitated at the later stage as well."
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document

Dr. Kafeel @ Dr. Kafeel Ahmad Khan vs State Of U.P. And Another on 26 August, 2021

esjs fopkj ls mDr fu.kZ; esa /kkjk 196 na0iz0la0 ,oa /kkjk 197 na0iz0la0 dks ,d lkFk fopkfjr fd;k x;k gS rFkk orZeku ekeys esa flQZ /kkjk 196 na0iz0la0 fopkfjr fd;k tk jgk gS] blfy, mDr fu.kZ; esas mfYyf[kr rF;] orZeku izdj.k ls fHkUu gSaA 11& fo}ku vij egkf/koDrk us vius rdZ ds leFkZu esa eku~uh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk CBI Vs. B.A.Srinivasan (2020) 2 Supreme Court Cases 153 esa izfrikfnr fof/k O;oLFkk dh vksj U;k;ky; dk /;ku vkd`"V fd;kA fdUrq ;g fu.kZ; /kkjk 197 na0iz0la0 ds laca/k esas ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] tcfd orZeku ekeys esa flQZ /kkjk 196 na0iz0la0 fopkfjr fd;k tk jgk gS] blfy, mDr fu.kZ; esas mfYyf[kr rF;] orZeku izdj.k esa ykxw ugha gksaxsA 12& fo}ku vij egkf/koDrk us vius rdZ ds leFkZu esa eku~uh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk Dharmesh @ Nanu Nitinbhai Shah Vs. State of Gujarat (2022) 45 ACC 519 esa izfrikfnr fof/k O;oLFkk dh vksj U;k;ky; dk /;ku vkd`"V fd;kA fdUrq mDr fu.kZ; ds rF; orZeku izdj.k ds rF;ksa ls fHkUu gSaA 13& fo}ku vij egkf/koDrk us vius rdZ ds leFkZu esa eku~uh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk Devinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab Through CBI (2016) 12 SCC 87 esa izfrikfnr fof/k O;oLFkk ds izLrj 39.8 dh vksj U;k;ky; dk /;ku vkd`"V fd;k] tks fuEuor~ gS %& "39.8. Question of sanction may arise at any stage of proceedings. On a police or judicial inquiry or in course of evidence during trial. Whether sanction is necessary or not may have to be determined from stage to stage and material brought on record depending upon facts of each case. Question of sanction can be considered at any stage of the proceedings. Necessity for sanction may reveal itself in the course of the progress of the case and it would be open to accused to place material during the course of trial for showing what his duty was. Accused has the right to lead evidence in support of his case on merits."
Allahabad High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - G Chowdhary - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next