Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 106 (0.35 seconds)
Documents citing Gokul Chandra Mallik vs The State Of W. B. & Ors on 21 April, 2022

Piuli Halder vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 11 June, 2025

In fact the Hon'ble Division Bench judgment in the case of Gokul Chandra Mallick (supra) has no scope for controversy or debate inasmuch as it has clearly laid down that the statutory provision casts a duty upon the District 6 Inspector of Schools to make an alternative arrangement within a time bound manner upon an application being forwarded to it by the school managing committee. The District Inspector of Schools in the case at hand has been found seriously wanting in taking steps in terms of the statutory mandate.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sangita Jana vs The State Of West Bengal & Others on 22 July, 2025

He argues that it is a fundamental principle that a statutory authority can act only in the manner he is permitted by the statutes. There is no provision in the notification dated 3rd January, 2022 to invite any option or choice of any other teacher to volunteer in rendering service to a school from which the appellant seeks transfer. As such, the learned single Judge erred in law in incorporating a rider to the effect that the DI(SE) has 'to make an endeavour to find out willing teacher of neighbouring school who can man the post of the petitioner temporarily till regular incumbent joins the post'. Such argument, as urged, was glossed over by the learned single Judge and no finding was returned on the same. Reliance has been placed upon a judgment of a co-ordinate Bench of this Court delivered in the case of Gokul Chandra 4 Mallick Vs. The State of West Bengal & Others [MAT 1218 of 2024].
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Banasree Roy vs The State Of West Bengal & Others on 22 July, 2025

He argues that it is a fundamental principle that a statutory authority can act only in the manner he is permitted by the statutes. There is no provision in the notification dated 3rd January, 2022 to invite any option or choice of any other teacher to volunteer in rendering service to a school from which the appellant seeks transfer. As such, the learned single Judge erred in law in not interfering with the order dated 2nd December, 2024 passed by the DI(SE) expressing his inability to consider the appellant's prayer due to non- availability of a willing teacher for local arrangement. Such argument, as urged, was glossed over by the learned single Judge and no finding was returned on the same. Reliance has been placed upon a judgment of a co-ordinate 4 Bench of this Court delivered in the case of Gokul Chandra Mallick Vs. The State of West Bengal & Others [MAT 1218 of 2024].
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Banasree Roy vs The State Of West Bengal & Others on 22 July, 2025

He argues that it is a fundamental principle that a statutory authority can act only in the manner he is permitted by the statutes. There is no provision in the notification dated 3rd January, 2022 to invite any option or choice of any other teacher to volunteer in rendering service to a school from which the appellant seeks transfer. As such, the learned single Judge erred in law in not interfering with the order dated 2nd December, 2024 passed by the DI(SE) expressing his inability to consider the appellant's prayer due to non- availability of a willing teacher for local arrangement. Such argument, as urged, was glossed over by the learned single Judge and no finding was returned on the same. Reliance has been placed upon a judgment of a co-ordinate 4 Bench of this Court delivered in the case of Gokul Chandra Mallick Vs. The State of West Bengal & Others [MAT 1218 of 2024].
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sangita Jana vs The State Of West Bengal & Others on 22 July, 2025

He argues that it is a fundamental principle that a statutory authority can act only in the manner he is permitted by the statutes. There is no provision in the notification dated 3rd January, 2022 to invite any option or choice of any other teacher to volunteer in rendering service to a school from which the appellant seeks transfer. As such, the learned single Judge erred in law in incorporating a rider to the effect that the DI(SE) has 'to make an endeavour to find out willing teacher of neighbouring school who can man the post of the petitioner temporarily till regular incumbent joins the post'. Such argument, as urged, was glossed over by the learned single Judge and no finding was returned on the same. Reliance has been placed upon a judgment of a co-ordinate Bench of this Court delivered in the case of Gokul Chandra 4 Mallick Vs. The State of West Bengal & Others [MAT 1218 of 2024].
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Banasree Roy vs The State Of West Bengal & Others on 22 July, 2025

He argues that it is a fundamental principle that a statutory authority can act only in the manner he is permitted by the statutes. There is no provision in the notification dated 3rd January, 2022 to invite any option or choice of any other teacher to volunteer in rendering service to a school from which the appellant seeks transfer. As such, the learned single Judge erred in law in not interfering with the order dated 2nd December, 2024 passed by the DI(SE) expressing his inability to consider the appellant's prayer due to non- availability of a willing teacher for local arrangement. Such argument, as urged, was glossed over by the learned single Judge and no finding was returned on the same. Reliance has been placed upon a judgment of a co-ordinate 4 Bench of this Court delivered in the case of Gokul Chandra Mallick Vs. The State of West Bengal & Others [MAT 1218 of 2024].
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next