Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (1.03 seconds)
Documents citing Mojey And Ors. And Sabya Nashyo And Ors. vs The Queen Empress on 18 March, 1890

Cbi vs . R. K. Sharma & Ors. Page No. 1 on 3 October, 2018

& Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, Bengal Vs Manmatha Bhushan Chaterjee & Ors. [AIR 1924 Cal 495]; (21) Mojey Vs The Queen 1890 ILR (17) 606 ( Calcutta High Court); (22) Smt. Runu Vs CBI [Cri CBI Vs. R. K. Sharma & Ors. Page No. 33 Appeal 482/2002, decided on 21.12.2011]; (23) Dr. Manmohan Singh Vs. CBI [Leave granted vide Order dated 01.04.2015, converted to Crl.Appeal No. 562-563/2015]; (24) Stephen Senevirante Vs. King (1936) 44 LW 661; (25) Tomaso Bruno Vs. State of UP (2015) 1 SCC 498; (26) Derry Vs. Peek, 1889 (14) AC 337; (27) Abdulla Mohammed Pagarkar Vs. State, (1980) 3 SCC 110; (28) C. Chenga Reddy and Others Vs. State of AP, (1996) 10 SCC 193.
Delhi District Court Cites 63 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Superintendent And Remembrancer Of ... vs Manmatha Bhusan Chatterjee And Ors. on 21 August, 1923

In Mojey's case (1890) 9 C.W.N. 764, however, the learned Judges said : "We think that the damage or harm must be the necessary consequence of the act done by reason of the deceit practised, or must be necessarily likely to follow therefrom." I take it that these expressions mean at their lowest that the damage must be the direct, natural or probable consequence of the induced act.
Calcutta High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Legal Remembrancer vs Manmatha Bhusan Chatterjee And Ors. on 21 August, 1923

In Mojey's case 17 C. 606 : 8 Ind. Dec. (N.S.) 943, however, the learned Judges said: "We think that the damage or harm must be the necessary consequence of the act done by reason of the deceit practised, or must benecessarily likely to follow therefrom." I take it that these expressions mean at their lowest that the damage must be the direct, natural or probable consequence of the inchiced act.
Calcutta High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1