Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (1.09 seconds)
Documents citing Manish Kumar Singh And 19 Others vs State Of U.P. And 6 Others on 25 July, 2016

Selvaraj vs The Inspector Of Police on 1 March, 2023

(iii)the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the case of Manish Singh Vs. State and Ors reported in 126(2006) DLT 28(DB) 4.1.By citing the above judgment in Manish Singh (supra), it is submitted that if a girl of 16 years makes a statement that she went with the accused by expressing her consent without any force, coercion or undue influence, her statement could be accepted and the proceedings against the accused should be quashed. The above observation is applicable to the facts of this case also. A document appears to be in a form of an affidavit is Page No.3 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.O.P.Nos.15500 of 2021 executed by the daughter of the second respondent was also produced before this Court. In the said affidavit she has stated that she had married the first accused willingly and now she is living with him.
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Puneet Singh vs State Of U.P.Thru Addl.Chief ... on 14 November, 2019

Since the issue in question is squarely covered with the judgment and order dated 18.10.2019 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in re: Manish Kumar Singh (supra) and there is no dispute of this point by the learned counsel for the opposite parties, therefore, this writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage in terms of judgment and order dated 18.10.2019 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in re: Manish Kumar Singh (supra).
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R S Chauhan - Full Document

Manish Kumar vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 30 July, 2020

It transpires from the pleadings made in the present writ petition particularly in para-5 that the petitioner along with seven others persons had earlier approached before this Court by way of filing a Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 3344 of 2020 (Manish Kumar and others Vs. State of U.P. and others) in which a co-ordinate Bench of this Court disposed of the same on 25.2.2020. On going through the said order annexed as Annexure-2 to the writ petition, it transpires that while disposing of the said writ petition, an interim order staying the arrest till submission of police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. was passed so far it related to the petitioner nos. 2 to 8 therein only. So far as it related to the petitioner no. 1 i.e. the present petitioner being husband of the of the victim, the writ petition was dismissed by the same order giving him liberty to apply for bail/anticipatory bail and now the present petitioner, who is husband, has come up with the prayer to refer the matter before Mediation Centre. It does not transpire from the pleadings made in the writ petition whether the petitioner has applied for bail/anticipatory bail after the order dated 25.2.2020 passed by this Court in the aforesaid writ petition or not. Even the question of referring the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre was concern, was available to the petitioner in his previous writ petition in which his prayer for quashing of the First Information Report and staying of arrest was refused.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Puneet Singh vs Shri Jagdish Secy. U.P. Public Service ... on 13 May, 2022

8. The aforesaid response of the opposite party clearly indicates that waiting list is prepared to the tune of 10% of the existing vacancies and the same will be been sent to the State Government as and when it is demanded. At this stage it is noticed that even the direction given in the case of Manish Kumar Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others - Writ-A No. 4204 of 2019, has been applied, considering that the waiting list has also been prepared by the Commissioner in terms of the directions issued in the case of Manish Kumar Singh (supra).
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Mathur - Full Document

Shanu Qureshi vs State Of U.P. on 25 July, 2022

It is further submitted that the applicant has no concerned with the crime indicated in the F.I.R.. The applicant is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the applicant has surfaced in the statement of Manish Singh, who has already been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 02.11.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.8275 of 2021; Manish Singh Vs. State of U.P. The other co-accused Vipin Awasthi, who is similar and identical to the applicant has also already been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 27.09.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4143 of 2020. It is also stated that the other co-accused, namely Ram Tirath, Pappu Jaiswal @ Amit Jaiswal and Suneel Jaiswal, the other accused in the case have already been granted bail by this Court vide its orders dated 15.9.2021, 21.10.2021 and 21.10.2021 passed in Bail Application Nos. 10145 of 2021, 11866 of 2019 and 11865 of 2019. The applicant is innocent and is in jail since 06.06.2019. Accordingly, the applicant is also entitled for bail. It is also submitted that there is no apprehension that after being released on bail, the applicant may flee from the course of law or may otherwise misuse the liberty of bail.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Mukim And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 11 April, 2023

In the judgment cited, the District Magistrate had only appended his signature on the gang chart. In the case at hand, on the contrary, the District Magistrate has written approved and thereafter appended his signature thereunder. Under the circumstances, therefore, the facts of the instant case are different from the facts in the case cited and relied upon. The petitioner, therefore, cannot be granted any benefit of the judgment in the case of Manish Kumar Singh (supra).
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A K Mishra - Full Document

Manish Kumar Singh vs State Of U P And 8 Others on 23 May, 2022

It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the order dated 21.09.2021 passed in Writ C No. 23593 of 2021 (Manish Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. and 7 others), an application has been filed by the petitioner before respondent No. 4, namely, Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Mirzapur on 26.09.2021, copy of which has been appended as annexure 10 to the writ petition, but till date no decision has been taken in the matter.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - P Padia - Full Document
1   2 Next