Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.21 seconds)

Mrs. Ramjyoti Devi vs State Of Jharkhand Through The Chief ... on 20 December, 2022

In "Damodar Kumar Ojha v. State of Jharkhand and others", reported in 2006 (2) JLJR 516 (2004 AIR Jhar HCR 1752) the retiral benefits of the pensioner who was working as forester in the State Trading Division Chatra South, Chatra, erstwhile Bihar State, was directed to be paid. The Court further observed, "but still the question is who shall pay the amount to concerned treasury in cases not covered by Clause 2 of the VIIIth Schedule, ordinarily it is the State of Bihar.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - A R Choudhary - Full Document

Surendra Prasad Thakur vs Personnel And Adminis Reform on 16 May, 2014

In  "Damodar   Kumar   Ojha   Vs.   State   of   Jharkhand   and   Others",  reported   in  2006   (2)   JLJR   516  the   retiral   benefits   of   the  pensioner who was working as forester in the State Trading Division  Chatra South, Chatra, erstwhile Bihar State, was directed to be paid.  The Court further observed, "but still the question is who shall pay  the amount to concerned treasury in cases not covered by Clause 2 of  the VIII th  Schedule, ordinarily it is the State of Bihar."
Jharkhand High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1