Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.97 seconds)
Documents citing All India Equality Forum And Ors vs Uoi And Ors on 25 November, 2022

Delhi Equality Forum (Regd) vs Vijay Dev , Chief Secretary (Delhi) & Anr on 16 April, 2026

"Because he orders, decision, action and conduct more particularly issuance of order no.F.55/18/2018/S-I/ dated 24,12.2018 by the 'Service' to the extent it out of turn, contrary ta settled law, rules promotes members of SC to the post of Grade 1 DASS)/SO, is n utter violation to the law settled by the Constitution Bench decisions in M. Nagaraj & Ors. Vs Union of India & Others (2006) 8 SCC 212 and Jarnail Singh and Others Vs Lachchmi Narain Gupta and others in Special Leave Petition (Civil) no. 30621/2011 and batch vide judgment dated 26.09.2018 and All India Equality Forum & Others Vs Union of India through its Secretary & Others' W.P.(C) no.3490/2010 DHC DOJ: 23.08.2017".
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - A Sharma - Full Document

Rajneesh Kumar Yadav And Ors vs Union Of India Thru Secretary, Railway ... on 23 January, 2024

3. According to the petitioners, initially, the matter of promotion and reservation therein was governed by the Office Memorandum dated 13/08/1997 issued by the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions of the Government of India. Under this Office Memorandum, reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in promotion was recognized till such time the representation of each of the two categories reached the prescribed percentage of reservation. This Office Memorandum was the subject matter of challenge before the Delhi High Court in Writ Petition (C) No.3490 of 2010 (All India Equality Forum & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.).
Bombay High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - A S Chandurkar - Full Document

Arvind Kumar Ranjan vs Western Railway on 11 March, 2025

For this purpose, he placed reliance on the case of All Indian Equality Forum and Others versus Union of India and Others in OA No. 727/2013 dated 29th November, 2018 of this Bench of this Tribunal in which it has been held that when illegal actions are taken by respondents, challenge can be raised at any point of time and when challenge is successfully made, that will render the initial action of respondents null and void. It is, therefore, not necessary to implead all the respondents who are going to be affected.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1