Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.41 seconds)
Documents citing Yalamarthi Narasimha Rao, vs The District Legal Services Authority ... on 6 January, 2022

Bandi Ramesh Chowdary, vs District Legal Services Authority, on 8 September, 2025

6. The above contentions raised by the petitioner do not contain any allegation of fraud, misrepresentation or undue influence on the petitioner. The petitioner does not plead or dispute that he had not agreed to the terms of the Award or that the said Award had been passed behind his back. The issues raised before this Court are purely issues relating to the legality of the Award. It is settled law that an Award passed by a Lok-Adalat can be challenged on the restricted grounds of undue influence, fraud or coercion. The aforesaid issues raised by the petitioner do not fall in any of these categories and as such, the said challenge would have to fail. We are fortified in this view by the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Yalamarthi Narasimha Rao vs. The District Legal Services Authoirity (Lok Adalath) at Vijaywada and Ors.1
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Sbi Cards And Payments Services Private ... vs Chairman, on 22 April, 2025

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner made submissions, inter alia, to the effect that the respondent No.2 by resorting to acts of mis- representation and fraud, secured the order impugned in the Writ Petition. Referring to the communication dated 31.10.2018, addressed to the respondent No.2 by the Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India, Kadapa Branch, and the legal notice dated 19.02.2018, got issued by the respondent No.2 to the General Manager, State Bank of India, as also Head Office of the State Bank of India Card Division, he would contend that though the respondent No.2 is aware that the State Bank of India Card Section is the concerned party, without impleading the same, the respondent No.2 approached the Permanent Lok Adalat and secured the impugned order by playing fraud. Placing reliance on the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in Yalamarthi Narasimha Rao Vs. The District Legal Services Authority (Lok Adalath) at 5 Vijayawada and Ors.1, learned counsel sought to impress upon this Court that as injustice was meted out at the behest of the respondent No.2, who obtained orders from the Permanent Lok Adalat by resorting to misrepresentation, the Writ Petition is maintainable and the petitioner may not be relegated to avail the other legal remedies against the order impugned in the Writ Petition.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - N Jayasurya - Full Document

Vaisakh A Nair vs The Managing Director, Ksrtc on 16 April, 2025

In Yalamarthi Narasimha Rao v. District Legal Services Authority (Lok Adalath) Krishna and others [2022 KHC OnLine 2812], a Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High W.P (C) 38403 OF 2024 10 2025:KER:32571 Court, while dealing with a case of identical nature, has observed that it has come across cases where parties are either impersonated or at times signatures of the parties are forged or parties before the Court are not made parties before the Lok Adalat. It is without verifying the identity of the parties that awards are being passed, which is leading to a multiplicity of litigations. Accordingly, the members of the Lok Adalats were directed to verify the identity of the parties.
Kerala High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - C S Dias - Full Document
1