Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.44 seconds)

M/S Light Group vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 24 April, 2025

7. Reference is also made to the Judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Umang Realtech (P.) Ltd v. Union of India [2024] 162 taxmann.com 817 (Delhi) and in Anhad Impex and another Vs. Assistance Commissioner [2024] SCC Online Delhi 1135, to which one of us (Sanjeev Sachdeva J.) was a party, wherein in similar circumstances, the Judgments of the Madras High Court have been relied upon to hold insufficiency of service of show cause notice and violation of principles of natural justice.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Singh Construction And Co. vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 24 April, 2025

7. Reference is also made to the Judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Umang Realtech (P.) Ltd v. Union of India [2024] 162 taxmann.com 817 (Delhi) and in Anhad Impex and another Vs. Assistance Commissioner [2024] SCC Online Delhi 1135, to which one of us (Sanjeev Sachdeva J.) was a party, wherein in similar circumstances, the Judgments of the Madras High Court have been relied upon to hold insufficiency of service of show cause notice and violation of principles of natural justice.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ayush Agarwal Proprietor Of M/S ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 6 August, 2025

7. Reference is also made to the Judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Umang Realtech (P.) Ltd v. Union of India [2024] 162 taxmann.com 817 (Delhi) and in Anhad Impex and another Vs. Assistance Commissioner [2024] SCC Online Delhi 1135, to which one of us (Sanjeev Sachdeva J.) was a party, wherein in similar circumstances, the Judgments of the Madras High Court have been relied upon to hold insufficiency of service of show cause notice and violation of principles of natural justice.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

Ayush Agarwal Proprietor Of M/S ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 6 August, 2025

7. Reference is also made to the Judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Umang Realtech (P.) Ltd v. Union of India [2024] 162 taxmann.com 817 (Delhi) and in Anhad Impex and another Vs. Assistance Commissioner [2024] SCC Online Delhi 1135, to which one of us (Sanjeev Sachdeva J.) was a party, wherein in similar circumstances, the Judgments of the Madras High Court have been relied upon to hold insufficiency of service of show cause notice and violation of principles of natural justice.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

Ayush Agarwal Proprietor Of M/S ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 6 August, 2025

7. Reference is also made to the Judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Umang Realtech (P.) Ltd v. Union of India [2024] 162 taxmann.com 817 (Delhi) and in Anhad Impex and another Vs. Assistance Commissioner [2024] SCC Online Delhi 1135, to which one of us (Sanjeev Sachdeva J.) was a party, wherein in similar circumstances, the Judgments of the Madras High Court have been relied upon to hold insufficiency of service of show cause notice and violation of principles of natural justice.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document
1