Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.55 seconds)

T.V.Sabu vs Secretary on 23 January, 2020

In Union of India v. T.V.L.N. Mallikarjuna Rao [(2015) 3 SCC 653], the dictum laid down in Shyam Babu Verma v. Union of India [(1994) 2 SCC 521 : 1994 (1) SLR 827] was reiterated, wherein it was held the principle of 'equal pay for equal work' should not be applied in a mechanical or casual manner. It was also reiterated that the classification made by a body of experts after full study and WP(C).No.29097 OF 2017(J) ..14..
Kerala High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - P V Asha - Full Document

Union Of India And Ors vs Mridula Gupta on 20 January, 2020

25. According to the Petitioners, this judgment holds that "EDP employees are not entitled to higher pay scale merely on the basis of their qualifications and service rendered in particular grade". Although the said decision in T. V. L. N. Mallikarjuna Rao (supra) did not discuss the MOD letter dated 6th December 1994, the Petitioners now contend that in view of the said judgment, the letter dated 6th December 1994 "does not hold good" and the placement of the Respondents herein in the grade of Programmer "is also not legally correct".
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S Muralidhar - Full Document

C. Suresh Kumar vs Union Of India on 28 June, 2017

8. Learned Central government counsel brought to our notice a recent judgment of the apex court in Union of India v. T.V.L.N. Mallikarjuna Rao - (2015) 3 SCC 653 wherein it was held that the difference in the pay scales based on educational qualifications, nature of job, responsibilities, accountability, experience and manner of recruitment does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution. It was held by the apex court :
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document

Perambalur Sugar Mills vs The Tamil Nadu All Co-Operative

12. Secondly, while discussing the issue on part of the “ Doctrine of Equal Page No.16/31 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.Nos. 54 to 56, 98 to 101 & 318 of 2016 and 11 to 13, 58 & 59 of 2017 pay for equal work”, the counsel representing the Appellants relied on the following dictum' laid down by the Hon'ble Apex court in the Judgment reported in Union of India v. T.V.L.N. Mallikarjuna Rao, 2015 3 SCC 653, “the classification of posts and determination of pay structure comes within the exclusive domain of the Executive and the Tribunal cannot sit in appeal over the wisdom of the Executive in prescribing certain pay structure and grade in a particular service.” Also in another case the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed in Shyam babu verma and ors., vs Union of India and ors., 1994 (2) SCC 521, that “The nature of work may be more or less the same but scale of pay may vary based on academic qualification or experience which justifies classification”.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - J N Banu - Full Document
1