citedby: 200529

Raja Ram Sharma vs District Judge And Others on 23 February, 2012

In Jagdish Prasad (supra) the Revisional Court had pointed out the legal error and in Shyam Lal (supra) the Trial Court had overlooked the weighty relevant material which was available on the record and which clinched the issue.

Allahabad High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - D Gupta - Full Document

Vijay Kumar Agarwal ... vs Ashok Kumar Handa on 29 August, 2020

23. Instant civil revision has been filed under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act. The scope of revision under Section 25 of Provincial Small Cause Courts Act is much wider than that of Section 151 of CPC. A reference may be made to a decision of Shyam Lal vs. Rasool Ahmed5, wherein it has been held as under:-

Uttarakhand High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - L P Singh - Full Document

Unknown vs Syndicate Bank Through Its Branch ... on 27 November, 2020

In Shyam Lal vs. Rasool Ahmed (2002) 9 SCC 499, it was held as under:-

Uttarakhand High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - L P Singh - Full Document

Punjab Sindh Kshetra vs Smt. Chunia Devi And Others on 17 March, 2020

10. My view is forfeited by the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Shyam Lal Vs. Rasool Ahmed reported in (2002) 9 SCC 499. Relevant paragraph-4 of the said judgment is extracted below:

Uttarakhand High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - L P Singh - Full Document

Ram Lal Pratham vs Chandu Lal Pratham And Another on 15 October, 2012

A plea of invalidity or defect in notice if not taken in the trial court, can not be urged for the first time in the appellate or revisonal forum vide 2002 (9) SCC 499 Shyam Lal Vs. Rasool Ahmad.

Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - P Mithal - Full Document

Mohd. Furqan vs A.D.J. Ayodhaya Prakarn Lucknow on 31 May, 2024

Ajeet Singh and another, 2008 SCC OnLine All 51; Govind Prasad versus IIIrd Additional District Judge, Meerut and others, 1998 SCC OnLine All 623; M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. versus Smt. Parvati Devi and others, ARC 1998(1) 36; Nihal Chand Khanduja versus Munsif Koli, Aligarh, 1988 SCCOnLine All 375 and Shyam Lal versus Rasool Ahmed (Dead) by L.Rs, 2002 (9) SCC 499.

Allahabad High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - M Mathur - Full Document

Bachhi Ram Dimari (Since Deceased) S/O ... vs Kshetriya Shri Gandhi Ashram Head ... on 23 October, 2007

41. Since U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 does not apply to the building in dispute, admittedly, the premises in dispute was let out to the defendants, therefore, the findings recorded by the Judge Small Cause Courts is wholly illegal and can be interfered under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act in view of the judgment of Shyam Lal (supra).

Uttarakhand High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - R Tandon - Full Document

Virendra Kumar vs Smt. Kusum And Others on 26 March, 2012

19. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents has referred to the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Shyam Lal Vs. Rasool Ahmed (Dead) by Lrs., (2002) 9 Supreme Court Cases 499 wherein in paragraph 4 it was held as follows;

Allahabad High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 1 - S K Gupta - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results