Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.43 seconds)
Documents citing Mrs.A.Abitha Nachi vs Tmt.K.S. Saroja on 20 October, 2016

S.Nagarajan vs M.Gunaseelan on 21 April, 2021

8. The learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner/Defendant has relied on several decisions. This is Court does not want to burden this order by citing all the above decisions. This Court deems it apposite to refer to the following paragraphs in the Judgment in A.Abitha Nachi vs. K.S.Saroja reported in 2016 (3) MWN (Civil) 404; which would be relevant for deciding the Civil Revision Petition.
Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - A D Chandira - Full Document

R.Muniappan vs P.K.Kaliyappan on 17 June, 2017

21. When there is absolutely no explanation on the part of the defendants 1, 2 and 4 with regard to the delay, that had occurred between first week of October 2013 and 04.04.2014, the trial Court had rightly dismissed the petition. Though there is no dispute with regard to the ratios laid down in the judgments relied upon by the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, since the petitioners/defendants 1, 2 and 4 have not explained the reasons in any manner whatsoever, the said judgments are not applicable to the present case. The judgments, relied upon by the learned counsel, appearing for the respondents, squarely applies to the facts and circumstances of the present case.
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - K Kalyanasundaram - Full Document

The State Of Tamil Nadu vs Pappammal on 19 September, 2017

6. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent / plaintiff, in support of his contentions, placed reliance upon the decisions reported in 2013-1- L.W.58 [Paramanandan vs. Selvanagaki and others], 2013 (1) MWN (Civil) 278 [Pandiarajan and others vs. R.Rajammal and another], 2016 (2) MWN (Civil) 233 [N.Pappayee Ammal and others vs. P.Ramasamy], 2016 (2) MWN (Civil) 578 [M.Somasundaram and others vs. Vetrivel], 2016 (3) MWN (Civil) 404 [A.Abitha Nachi vs. K.S.Saroja and others] and 2016 (1) MWN (Civil) 721 [Hemamalini vs. T.Sakunthala]. The principles of law outlined in the above cited decisions are taken into consideration and followed as applicable to the facts and circumstances of the case at hand.
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - T Ravindran - Full Document
1