Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.52 seconds)
Documents citing Kulbir Singh S/O Sunder Singh And Ors. vs State Of Punjab on 31 January, 2008

Kulbir Singh vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 8 July, 2022

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner argued that the petitioner had approached this Court vide CRM-M No.3476 of 2017 titled as Kulbir Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others for issuance of direction to the respondents therein to submit final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. before the court of competent jurisdiction. The respondents therein had appeared and filed the status report admitting the innocence of the petitioner in the FIR in question. The said petition was disposed of with a direction to complete the investigation at the earliest and if the petitioner was not required then appropriate action be taken in this regard at the earliest, preferably within a period of two months. It was further argued that as per status report filed by SSP, Ferozepur dated 23.05.2022, after completion of investigation qua Shiv Kumar, Shamsher Singh, Amarjit Singh, Gurmeet Singh and Bhupinder Singh, challan has been presented against them and petitioner has been declared innocent. Therefore, since the petitioner has been declared innocent both in the initial inquiry conducted by SHO, Police Station, Ferozepur Cantt as well as in the final report submitted before the court of competent jurisdiction, the petitioner is entitled to be appointed to the post of Constable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - J Thakur - Full Document

Avtar Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 11 November, 2011

Later, another Full Bench of this court in a judgment dated 13.12.2001 reported as Vijay Sharma Vs. State of Punjab 2002 (1) SLR 694, in CWP No.14050 of 1999 and other five cases, considering the judgments, mentioned above as well as in State of Punjab and others Vs. CWP No.14796 of 2003, 8 CWP No.8903 of 2010 & CWP No.22092 of 2010 Devinder Singh and others (Civil Appeal No.4942 of 1997 decided on 21.07.1997); Talwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab (CWP No.7533 of 1995 decided on 18.03.1998) Annexure P-1; Kulbir Singh Vs. State of Punjab 1999 (1) SCT 344; State of Punjab Vs. Talwinder Singh (Civil Appeal No.4867 of 1998 decided on 13.12.2000); Bhagwati Parshad Vs. Delhi State Mineral Corporation AIR 1990 SC 371; Food Corporation of India Vs. Shyamol K. Chatterjee, AIR 2000 SC3554; Chandigarh Admn. and others etc.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 60 - Cited by 82 - Full Document

Baljit Singh vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 12 January, 2018

The petitioners are holders of contracts permitting them to mine minor minerals in the State of Punjab. There common grievance is that the State of Punjab, by virtue of the impugned notices, has asked them to either surrender their existing contracts or to execute a fresh contract at the rate, at which mines within the Districts, have been given for prospecting of minor or minerals by auction through 'progressive bidding'; in the absence of any mines having been auctioned by 'progressive bidding' within the District, at the auction rate of adjoining District. Since, common questions of fact and law arise in this bunch of writ petitions, this judgment will decide CWP No.12664 of 2017 (O&M) titled Baljit Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13166 of 2017 (O&M) titled Gurpal Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13553 of 2017 (O&M) titled Rakesh Kumar versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13579 of 2017 (O&M) titled Jagvir Inder Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13578 of 2017 (O&M) titled Puneet Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13530 of 2017 (O&M) titled Kamaljit Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP 15 of 55 ::: Downloaded on - 04-02-2018 19:43:57 ::: CWP-12664-2017 (O&M) and other connected cases 16 No. 13428 of 2017 (O&M) titled Gurwinder Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13574 of 2017 (O&M) titled Ashok Chandak versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13573 of 2017 (O&M) titled Kuldeep Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13586 of 2017 (O&M) titled Puneet Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13509 of 2017 (O&M) titled Avtar Singh and Co. versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13510 of 2017 (O&M) titled Harsimran Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13511 of 2017 (O&M) titled Kanwar Mahip Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13512 of 2017 (O&M) titled Avtar Singh and Co. versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13570 of 2017 (O&M) titled AG Mines versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13571 of 2017 (O&M) titled M/s Jagadhri Royalty Co. versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13572 of 2017 (O&M) titled Kamaljit Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13587 of 2017 (O&M) titled M/s KBM Contractors versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13588 of 2017 (O&M) titled M/s KBM Contractors versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13508 of 2017 (O&M) titled Hardeep Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13522 of 2017 (O&M) titled Dharminder Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13567 of 2017 (O&M) titled Punit Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13427 of 2017 (O&M) titled Kulbir Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13311 of 2017 (O&M) titled Navjit Kumar versus State of Punjab and others, 16 of 55 ::: Downloaded on - 04-02-2018 19:43:57 ::: CWP-12664-2017 (O&M) and other connected cases 17 CWP No. 13521 of 2017 (O&M) titled Arvinderpaul Dhounsi versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13577 of 2017 (O&M) titled M/s S.M. Contractors and Suppliers versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13531 of 2017 (O&M) titled Sunil Grover versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13581 of 2017 (O&M) titled Karanvir Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13583 of 2017 (O&M) titled Jai Luxmi Suppliers versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13585 of 2017 (O&M) titled M/S Satluj Contractor versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13580 of 2017 (O&M) titled Babu Ram Sharma versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13584 of 2017 (O&M) titled Raghav Chandak versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13524 of 2017 (O&M), Gobindpur Royalty Co. versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13523 of 2017 (O&M) titled Puneet Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13590 of 2017 (O&M) titled Kanwarmahip Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13568 of 2017 (O&M) titled Gobindpur Royalty Co. versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13569 of 2017 (O&M) titled Doaba Contractors versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13564 of 2017 (O&M) titled Gurwinder Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13532 of 2017 (O&M) titled Kanwar Mahip Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13994 of 2017 (O&M) titled Sukhpal Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 14002 of 2017 (O&M) titled Kabal Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13264 of 2017 (O&M) titled Sanjeev Kumar 17 of 55 ::: Downloaded on - 04-02-2018 19:43:57 ::: CWP-12664-2017 (O&M) and other connected cases 18 versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13426 of 2017 (O&M) titled Kamal Kumar versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13513 of 2017 (O&M) titled KBM Contractors versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13514 of 2017 (O&M) titled Manpreet Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13515 of 2017 (O&M) titled M/S Shree Guru Nanak Mines versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13516 of 2017 (O&M) titled M/S S.M. Contractors and Suppliers versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13517 of 2017 (O&M) titled M/S K.B.M. Contractors versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13518 of 2017 (O&M) titled Balwinder Kumar versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13519 of 2017 (O&M) titled Kamaljit Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13520 of 2017 (O&M) titled Sanjiv Bhardwaj versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13525 of 2017 (O&M) titled Silver North Mines versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13526 of 2017 (O&M) titled Kamaljit Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13527 of 2017 (O&M) titled Brij Bhushan versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13533 of 2017 (O&M) titled AKM Screening Plant versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13563 of 2017 (O&M) titled Yadwinder Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13565 of 2017 (O&M) titled Des Raj versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13566 of 2017 (O&M) titled Shri Kanwar Mahip Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13575 of 2017 (O&M) titled Hardeep Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13576 of 2017 18 of 55 ::: Downloaded on - 04-02-2018 19:43:57 ::: CWP-12664-2017 (O&M) and other connected cases 19 (O&M) titled Kanwar Mahip Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13582 of 2017 (O&M) titled M/S Zirakpur Royalty Co. versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13589 of 2017 (O&M) titled Avneet Kumar versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13591 of 2017 (O&M) titled Mohan Pal Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 25701 of 2017 (O&M) titled Surjeet Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 25703 of 2017 (O&M) titled Sarban Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 25733 of 2017 (O&M) titled DC Taneja and Sons versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 25734 of 2017 (O&M) titled Ram Sarup versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 25736 of 2017 (O&M) titled DC Taneja and Sons versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 25755 of 2017 (O&M) titled DC Taneja and Sons versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 25775 of 2017 (O&M) titled Navjeet Kumar versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 25779 of 2017 (O&M) titled M/S Arman Singh and Co. versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 25786 of 2017 (O&M) titled M/S Ranjit Singh and Co. versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 25790 of 2017 (O&M) titled Kuldeep Singh and Co. versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 25838 of 2017 (O&M) titled Ram Sarup versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 25839 of 2017 (O&M) titled Parkash Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 26001 of 2017 (O&M) titled Ram Sarup versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 26263 of 2017 (O&M) titled Harjinder Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 26266 of 19 of 55 ::: Downloaded on - 04-02-2018 19:43:57 ::: CWP-12664-2017 (O&M) and other connected cases 20 2017 (O&M) titled Swaran Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 26292 of 2017 (O&M) titled Kuldeep Singh versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 26306 of 2017 (O&M) titled Munish Grover and Co. versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13993 of 2017 (O&M) titled Gauravjit Singh Deol versus State of Punjab and others, CWP No. 13996 of 2017 (O&M) titled Surinder Kumar versus State of Punjab and others and CWP No. 14003 of 2017 (O&M) titled Gurmeet Singh versus State of Punjab and others.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 34 - S Mittal - Full Document

Surinder Balraj And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others on 5 September, 2011

"Collector Land Acquisition, Department of Industries & Comm. Punjab have moved an application for the release of amount, which is deposited in the court as per the enhanced amount of compensation ordered by the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court. As per report of Nazir, a sum of `72,82,829/- is lying deposited undisbursed in the case titled Kulbir Singh Vs. State of Punjab. Along with this application, there is an order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India duly received in the court bearing SLP Civl No.5765/2010 arising out of RFA No.1802 of 1995 titled Punjab Small Indus.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 2 - M S Sullar - Full Document

Smt. Pushpa Bhardwaj vs State Of Haryana And Another on 4 April, 2013

Learned counsel for the petitioner was unable to show that application sent on 11.2.1985 was ever accepted by the department. As per averments in the written statement, the petitioner had been intimated vide communication dated 27.1.1986 (Annexure R-1) but the petitioner failed to comply with the same. The plea of the petitioner that Annexure R-1 was never received by her cannot be accepted in the light of plea in the written statement to which there is no denial by way of replication. This Court in Kulbir Singh v. State of Punjab 1992(1) SCT 209 where on expiry of sanctioned leave, the petitioner had failed to join the duty and had sent another application for further leave which was never accepted held that only presumption in such circumstances would be that of abandonment of the post. The relevant observations read thus:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A K Mittal - Full Document

Chander Kanta Deceased Th Lr vs Davinder Parmar And Ors on 17 February, 2016

15. In ROR No.433 of 2013, I am of the view that order dated 30.4.2013 passed by Hon'ble High Court in CWP No.16713 and 12883 of 2012 the parties were relegated to appear before Financial Commissioner and he was directed to decide the matter within six months in view of these orders. Parties should have appeared before this court for hearing in the matter for decision of petition after the High Court order. However proceedings were initiated before Assistant Collector Ist at instance of Smt. Davinder Parmar one of the share holder. It is stated in order dated 17.7.2013 of A.C. 1st grade that in CWP No.12883 of 2012 titled as Kulbir Singh versus State of Punjab, Hon'ble High Court passed order dated 30.4.2013 where A.C. 1st grade initiated the proceedings on the basis of order dated 16.11.2012 passed by Division Bench of High Court in LPA No. 1723 of 2012. The Division Bench order was followed by Single Bench in CWP 12883 and 17613 of 2012 and relegated the parties to the Court of Financial Commissioner for decision in view of order of Division Bench. While the case was under
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R Bhalla - Full Document

Kulbir Singh Thakur vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 12 December, 2017

2. Undisputably, petitioner earlier preferred a writ petition bearing CWP No. 414 of 2008, captioned as Kulbir Singh Thakur vs. State of Punjab 1 of 4 ::: Downloaded on - 24-12-2017 13:50:36 ::: CWP No. 10230 of 2014 (O&M) - 2- and others seeking mandamus to direct the respondents to protect his pay as was being drawn by him in the Punjab State Handloom and Textile Development Corporation Ltd. (PUNTEX) and also to count the service rendered by him in the said Corporation towards retiral benefits. The said writ petition was allowed vide order dated February 23, 2010 and respondents were directed to grant the necessary reliefs to the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified of the said order. In compliance of the said order dated February 23, 2010 passed in CWP No. 414 of 2008, the case of the petitioner for the revision of gratuity and leave encashment was taken up and accordingly, payment on account of gratuity and leave encashment was made to the petitioner on April 04, 2012 and September 06, 2012, respectively.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document

Kulbir Singh vs State Of Punjab on 4 November, 2016

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is a member of said Committee and in view of the notification No. SO 3325(e) dated 26th October, 2016 issued by Govt. of India which has been received by Chief Secretary, Shiromani Gurduwara Parbhandhak Committee, Sri Amritsar, the General Meeting of Shiromani Gurduwara Parbhandhak Committee, Sri Amritsar has been fixed for 05.11.2016 in the afternoon at 12.15 p.m. in the office of Shiromani Gurduwara Parbhandhak Committee, Teja Singh Samundri Hall, Sri Amritsar and the petitioner being a member of SGPC has been asked to attend this meeting. He states that though FIR No. 205 dated 05.11.2015 under Sections 302/307/326/323/ 324/148/149/120-B IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act at Police Station Sadar, Jalandhar has been filed against the petitioner but he had been admitted to interim bail in the past as well. He refers to order passed by this Court in Crl. Misc. No. M-32217 of 2016 titled as Kulbir Singh vs. State of Punjab whereby after attending the bhog ceremony of his father on 13.9.2016, he had surrendered back.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - H P Verma - Full Document

Sukhwinder Singh vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 16 November, 2017

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that his brother Kulbir Singh - respondent No.4 has filed the civil suit titled Kulbir Singh Vs. Punjab State and others in which Surinder Pal son of late Sh. Munni Lal has been impleaded as defendant No.3. It is further submitted that in the head-note and para 9 of the plaint, there is reference that defendant 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 10-12-2017 07:00:12 ::: CR No.5281 of 2017 (O&M) 2 No.3 had sold certain land since long in favour of the plaintiff being the legal heir of Munni Lal but the defendant is representing his father's name as Kewal Krishan, got Government service in Police Department by making misleading statements and fabricating documents. It is further argued that the petitioner and his brother Kulbir Singh are not on cordial terms as is apparent from the FIR lodged by the petitioner against Kulbir Singh and his son. It is further argued that as the petitioner is also one of the vendees under the sale deed dated 15.09.1992 executed by Kewal Krishan, Mohinder Pal, Sawinder Pal sons of Muni Lal and Tripta Rani daughter of Muni Lal and the petitioner is in cultivating possession of the said land, the petitioner is required to be impleaded as a party to protect his interest in the lis, even if he is not held to be a necessary party for complete and effective adjudication of the matter in controversy. It is further submitted that any finding recorded by the Court on the basis of allegations raised by Sh. Kulbir Singh is likely to affect adversely to the petitioner, therefore, he is required to be impleaded as a party.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Mittal - Full Document
1   2 Next