Amit Tirpathi vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 26 July, 2018
alleges that she resides with her father in Vijyanagar Palace
campus and she knew accused Amit Tripathi who was
pursuing his academic career at Jiwaji University.
Prosecutrix further alleges that six months back the said
accused Amit Tripathi met her at Chetakpuri Petrol Pump
and threatened her that he would not allow the marriage
proposal of the prosecutrix with other person to turn into
reality. The prosecutrix was scared and therefore, disclosed
the said incident to his family members after few days. The
father of the prosecutrix then talked with family members
of co-accused Amit (Yogesh Tripathi, Smt. Sudha Tripathi,
Dimple Balothia and Shri Gautam Balothia who are all
accused in the case). These family members it is alleged in
the FIR did not pay any heed to the objections made by
the father of the prosecutrix. It is further alleged that these
co-accused (family members of accused Amit) threatened
the father of the prosecutrix of dire consequences if the
2
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C No. 4022/2015
(Shri Amit Tripathi & Ors. Vs. The State of M.P.& ors.)
marriage of the prosecutrix is materialized with any person
other than accused Amit. In January/February-2015, the
father of the prosecutrix was invited by the accused. The
accused demanded Rs. 20 Lakhs from the father of
prosecutrix with the threat that if the demand is not met,
they would not allow the marriage of the prosecutrix to
take place. The FIR further alleges that in the premises of
the high court immediately after the proceedings in W.P.
No. 1357/15 (writ petition seeking issuance of writ of
habeas corpus) falsely filed by the accused against the
father of prosecutrix, similar threat was extended. FIR
lastly states that the threats of similar nature continued to
be extended by accused against the prosecutrix and her
family members and that false and forged documents were
also prepared by exercise of fraud and conspiracy to
blackmail the prosecutrix and her family members.