Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.33 seconds)
Documents citing Vinayak Purshottam Dube Deceased ... vs Jayashree Padmakar Bhat on 25 September, 2023

Madhubun Educational Books ... vs Ms. Kaveri on 18 August, 2025

The plaintiff has also relied on two judgments i.e. Vinayak Purshotam Dubey Vs. Jai Shree Padmakar Bhatt, 2024 (9) SCC 398 and M. G. Tours and Travels Vs. Union of India, 2024 Law Suit (Del) 866. As per these two judgments, it is held by Hon. Courts that if the nature of the contract to be performed is such that, it could only be performed by the person (when he was alive), then there is no liability of the legal heirs. Otherwise, CS (COMM) No.158/2023 Madhubun Educational Vs. Kaveri Page 11/17 12 the legal heirs can be impleaded in the running suit. As far as the law laid down in these judgments, these are self explanatory.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Paras Kanwar vs M/O Communications on 10 November, 2025

16. The first judgment cited by the respondents, i.e., Vinayak Purushottam Dubey (supra), is a case relating to the Consumer Protection Act. It was also concerned with the impact of the dissolution of a sole proprietorship and how the legal heirs of the sole proprietor [should be treated] in the context of a purchase of a flat. It has no bearing or relevance to the present case, except insofar as it explains the difference between personal rights and rights relating to status. The application of such a principle in respect of a contract of employment, like the one which is the subject matter of the present dispute, would only be in a situation relating to the termination of the employee, or promotion, or any other dispute where it was necessary for him himself to remain alive.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jodhpur Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1