Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.31 seconds)
Documents citing Sushil Kumar Gautam And 16 Others vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 2 August, 2021

Bhoop Singh Yadav And Others vs U.P. Cooperative Federation Thru Its ... on 29 May, 2024

In view of the above, the opposite party no. 2 i.e. the Managing Director, Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Federation, Station Road, Lucknow is hereby directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners for grant of Grade Pay of Rs. 1900/-in the light of the government order dated 30-03-2016, as well as considering the Judgment and order dated 02-08-2021, passed in Writ A No. 20277 of 2019(Sushil Kumar Gautam & 16 Others Vs State of U.P. & Others), within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Autar And 22 Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ... on 25 October, 2024

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the respondent no. 1 is hereby directed to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 18.10.2024 taking into consideration the judgement and order dated 02.08.2021 passed in Writ A No. 20277 of 2019 (Sushil Kumar Gautam and 16 others Vs. State of U.P. and 2 others) within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Mathur - Full Document

Vijay Pal Singh And 38 Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. ... on 11 November, 2024

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, liberty is granted to the petitioners to move fresh representations to the respondent no. 1 within two weeks from today and in case such representations are moved, the respondent No. 1 is directed to proceed and decide the representations of the petitioners taking into consideration the judgement and order dated 02.08.2021 passed in Writ A No. 20277 of 2019 (Sushil Kumar Gautam and 16 others Vs. State of U.P. and 2 others) within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Mathur - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar And 18 Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. ... on 20 January, 2025

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, liberty is granted to the petitioners to move fresh representations to the respondent no. 1 within two weeks from today and in case such representations are moved, the respondent No. 1 is directed to proceed and decide the representations of the petitioners taking into consideration the judgement and order dated 02.08.2021 passed in Writ A No. 20277 of 2019 (Sushil Kumar Gautam and 16 others Vs. State of U.P. and 2 others) within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Mathur - Full Document

Mohammad Shakeel And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. ... on 12 March, 2025

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, liberty is granted to the petitioners to move fresh representations to the respondent no. 1 within two weeks from today and in case such representations are moved, the respondent No. 1 is directed to proceed and decide the representations of the petitioners taking into consideration the judgement and order dated 02.08.2021 passed in Writ A No. 20277 of 2019 (Sushil Kumar Gautam and 16 others Vs. State of U.P. and 2 others) within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Mathur - Full Document

Rajendra Pratap Singh And 15 Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. ... on 31 May, 2022

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the respondent no. 1 is hereby directed to decide the matter of the petitioner taking into consideration the judgement and order dated 02.08.2021 passed in Writ A No. 20277 of 2019 (Sushil Kumar Gautam and 16 others Vs. State of U.P. and 2 others) and any other order that may have been passed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - P Bhatia - Full Document

Sushil Kumar And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 28 November, 2022

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and in view of the judgment of this Court in Sushil Kumar Gautam (supra), the impugned order dated 16.09.2022 is set aside and the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment of this Court in Writ-A No. 20277 of 2019 (Sushil Kumar Gautam and 16 others Vs. State of U.P. and 2 others, decided on 2.8.2021) and similar benefits be extended to the petitioners in terms of the aforesaid judgment.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chandan Kumar Shukla And Others vs U.P. Cooperative Federation Thru. Its ... on 24 May, 2024

In view of the above, the opposite party no. 2 i.e. the Managing Director, Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Federation, Station Road, Lucknow is hereby directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners for grant of Grade Pay of Rs. 2000/-in the light of the government order dated 18-03-2011, as well as considering the Judgment and order dated 02-08-2021, passed in Writ A No. 20277 of 2019(Sushil Kumar Gautam & 16 Others Vs State of U.P. & Others), within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ravi Kumar Yadav vs Union Of India And 4 Others on 15 November, 2022

In this respect, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgments passed by this Court in Writ-A No.15075 of 2010 (Sushil Kumar Gautam Vs. State of U.P. and others) decided on 22.8.2022, Union of India and others Vs. Devendra Kumar Chaudhary and others (2018) 0 Supreme (All) 961, Writ Petition No.2813 of 2017 (Ran Vijay Singh and others Vs. Union of India and others) decided on 16.4.2018, Special Appeal No.1045 of 2018 (Union of India and others Vs. Ran Vijay Singh and others) decided on 8.5.2019 and Writ -A No.56499 of 2011 (Rajesh Kumar Vs. Union of India and others) decided on 5.11.2014. Learned counsel for the petitioner further urged that there were other material available which could have established the identity of the petitioner as the person who participated in the recruitment process.
Allahabad High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next