Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.51 seconds)
Documents citing H.M.T. Limitedwormen Of Indian ... vs H.M.T. Head Office Employees' Asso. And ... on 29 October, 1996

Ravindra Kumar, Advocate And Anohter vs State Of U.P. And Others on 13 August, 1998

10. However, Sri H. S. Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that in view of the observations of Hon'ble Supreme Court in H.M.T. Ltd. v. H.M.T. Head Office Employees' Association and others, (1996) 11 SCC 319 and Communist Party of India (M) v. Bharat Kumar, (1998) 1 SCC 201. strike of teachers may be declared unconstitutional and illegal and they be not paid their wages/salary for the period they went on strike. In this regard, I am of the view that the direction of the Supreme Court in those cases pertained to the strike by workers and it has no relevance to the facts and circumstances of the present case and this aspect of the matter can be looked into by the appropriate authorities.
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs Workmen Employed In The Refinery ... on 6 October, 2000

In the case of H.M.T. Ltd. (supra) the Supreme Court after having held that the strike was illegal and that employees were not entitled to wages during the strike period, it further held that the strike was unjustified. In the case cited the workmen after calling off the strike continued to disrupt working of factories from within the factory premises. As a consequence of which lock out was declared and the Supreme Court held that it was not an illegal lock out, even if provisions of Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act were not complied with. The Supreme Court did not grant wages for the lock out period. In our case, the management acted with prudence to avoid any disruption in the working of the factory from within the factory premises as admittedly the manufacturing process involved several hazards and dangers and as the shutting down of the plant required a period of 72 hours, the action of the management in starting the shutting down of the process to meet any risky situation cannot be called a lock out.
Bombay High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 6 - R J Kochar - Full Document

*Aoqp]5K-R/S`=0@9 H 0 Hst (U5K- vs *8/W- Xrykt,O6Nul?0 on 23 November, 2009

"!#! "$ % & ')(+*,( - .&/,0 1&2436587 * 9:'<;=9,>?5@0 ACBEDGFIH 0KJ4L,MKN O@OP0 Q NR/K0SLUT,O6NWV8V,X BZY\[ 0 Y ' D]H 5^;=9^;=_81I-U`=5a;b0 cedgf]hji kmlmn *aoqp]5K-r/s`=0@9 H 0 HSt (u5K- vs*8/w- xryKT,O6NuL?0 z oqp]5K- {4*K( - H^t v H?| | ;}/6/s; H 9 H^t ( 5,- xry8y~Nu@O6N€ywO@O@OP0 H^tZt -?9,v6- vo‚p]5K- {4*K(+- HSt ;=9S/ƒ(„;…(„26(„; H 9 H^t v*4/†- xry6X†NuSMKNuL@@@P0 {@oqp]5K-‡9S* | - HSt (u5K- v H?| ˆ `‰*U;=9,*?9w( xŠ' Ba‹ *?9 HŒ<Ž 2 | * 7 0 -@oqp]5K-‡9S* | -:#*a{8{?7 -4// HSt *@v6vS2^/w-@{ x:12835@7+* 9:'<;=9,> 58_^' N H 0 D * | ‘ ;=7’{S“S*r'<;=9,>?5@_ D N H 06.&;”`”`•*@>@- – -,(—* ˆ 287 _ Y ' Y *?3 H `”;…“S*?_81˜;}/ƒ( 7™;šv›( œ *4/(„;=_^ž QŸY oW0 t o‚p]5K- H^tZt -?9,v6- v H?| ˆ `•*U;=9K-@{ H^t x Q NR/K0,L T,OwN V@VSX BEYe[ 0 >aoqp]5K- ˆ `š-4* HSt (u5K- *@v6vS2^/w-@{ x ˆ `‰-8*@{@-@{‡9 H (?> 2a;”`…(Z“40 5Koqp]5K- {4*K( - H^t 7’-U/†-P7E¡@;=9,>Š( 5,- H 7 {@-?7 x PVN~y@y¢NuL@@@OP0 ;‰o‚p]5,- t ;=9,*U` H 7’{@-P7 x¤£˜v¥ 2@; (¦(+-@{?0 Œ o‚p]5,- {8*K(+- HSt /K2,v^5 H 7 {@-P7 x§L?VN~y@y¢NuL@@@OP0 n]¨©k ª©«&¬’k<­®«Ÿk?¯ °m±:lI° ­4±:«²n]¨©k‚cedŸfIh:i k<l³n x yK0 œ 7™;‰- t 7’-U/s2 | - H^t t *@v´(™/ HSt (u5K- ˆ 7 -4/w-?96(µvs*8/w- * 7’- ( 5S*K( H 9¶y8y~Nu@OwN~y†O8O@O?_^*,( * z H 26(·LPxb@ ˆ8| _ *K( œ 5,*8>s¸%* 9 ‹ * 5S*K¡@;=7 D]H *a{?_ Y¹H v^3ƒ-,(˜1]º»y6L _C'¼-8v´( H 7’º½T8_ D]H 5a;=9^;=_ 1]- `=5^;=_ *avv,2a/†-8{¾¸%*8/ t’H 289K{ {?7™;…¡a;=9,>¿(u7™2,v^3À9 H 081ŸÁsº€ywÂ%º€ywXaO\y H 9
Delhi District Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1