Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.47 seconds)
Documents citing Chandrawati Devi vs State Of U.P. And 6 Others on 15 December, 2020

Madhyan Bhojan Rasoiya Mazdoor Sangh ... vs Union Of India Throu Secy.Ministry Of ... on 8 February, 2023

23. He informs that this Court, noticing the plight of mid day meal cooks had passed an order in Writ - A No.9927 of 2020 (Chandrawati Devi v. State of U.P. & Ors.) wherein a similar issue ,with regard to payment of wages at the rate of Rs.1,000/- per month to the Cooks preparing Mid Day meal, was held to be other form of forced labour prohibited under Article 23 of the Constitution of India.The Court placing reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of People's Union for Democratic Rights and Others v. Union of India and Others; (1982) 3 SCC 235 had allowed the writ petition and gave directions for payment of minimum wages to the Cooks across the State of Uttar Pradesh vide judgment dated 15.12.2020. He further argues that the said order was set aside in Special Appeal Defective No.123 of 2021 mainly on the ground that the relief granted by the Court was beyond what was prayed for in the said writ petition.
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 1 - P Bhatia - Full Document

Rammurti Devi vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 4 September, 2025

Learned counsel for the petitioner also contends that non-consideration of the claim of the petitioner is arbitrary. The Government School in which the petitioner is working as Safai Karmchari has a strength of near about 200 to 250 students. She has been assigned the work of cleaning toilets, bathrooms and other cleaning work. Learned counsel for the petitioner relying upon the judgment and observations made by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Writ-A No.9927 of 2020 (Chandrawati Devi vs. State of U.P. And 6 Others) as decided on 15.12.2020, submits that she is entitled to be considered for regularization and payment of wages as per the work assigned to her, therefore, a direction may be issued for considering the regularization of the petitioner and payment of wages relying upon the principle of "Equal Pay for Equal Work".
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - M R Chauhan - Full Document

Smt. Manki Devi vs State Of U.P. And Others on 25 April, 2025

8. The judgment cited on behalf of petitioner, i.e., Smt. Somwati v. State of U.P. and 2 others, Special Appeal Defective No.503 of 2015; Prem Singh v. State of U.P. and others, AIR 2019 SC 4390; Geeta Devi v. State of U.P. and 6 others, Writ-A No.9201 of 2018; and Smt. Bodari Shukla v. State of U.P., 2003 0 Supreme(Al) 455, would also not be beneficiary, since they are on a different issue, whereas a judgment cited by respondent passed in case of Chandrawati Devi v. State of U.P. and another, 2010 LawSuit (All) 2827 is on the issue and applicable in facts and circumstances of present case, though against the petitioner.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S S Shamshery - Full Document

Vitti Bai vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 20 January, 2021

Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon a judgment passed in Writ-A No. 9927 of 2020 ( Chandrawati Devi Vs. State of U.P. and others) decided on 15.12.2020 to submit that the petitioner is entitled to atleast minimum wages fixed for the work being performed by the him. It is stated that petitioner's grievance would be got examined by respondent no.3.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Mishra - Full Document

Surendra Kumar vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 4 April, 2023

Petitioner before this Court has claimed payment of salary for the period w.e.f. March 2017 till January 2022 when he officiated as Principal of the Institution on the premise that officiating Principal of the Institution is entitled to the same salary as of a regular Principal of the Institution in view of the Full Bench of this Court in Chandrawati Devi v. State of U.P. & Others, (2021) ILR 1 All 818.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Chandrawati Devi vs State Of Up And 5 Others on 5 August, 2024

1. Submission is, despite earlier order passed by the writ Court in Writ Tax No.1017 of 2024 (Chandrawati Devi Vs. State of U.P. and 5 Others), the respondent State-authorities are seeking to cancel the petitioner's excise license on one pretext or the other. Only to defeat the direction issued on 08.07.2024 in Writ Tax No.1017 of 2024, the petitioner's application for grant of Character Certificate has been wrongly rejected on false ground.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S D Singh - Full Document
1